We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
partners verbal warning
Carl31
Posts: 2,616 Forumite
My partners just received a verbal warning for a matter that her employer has no way of proving. Admittedly, their assumption makes sense, however the matter concerns a key safe which is accessable by the public. My partner works in care and has been accused of leaving the safe open, although she is one of many people that can access it, including the public at large, although it does have a combination that needs to be known.
Is it worth challenging?
Is it worth challenging?
0
Comments
-
There's a bit l don't understand, many people can access it and they all know the combination?
You don't need to challenge a verbal warning as such, but l think l would ask if anyone else has received the warning too. If they have fine, but if not ask them why they believe it's your wife.
I would politely say l'm not happy as l would never do that but then leave it at that.
Happy moneysaving all.0 -
There's a bit l don't understand, many people can access it and they all know the combination?
You don't need to challenge a verbal warning as such, but l think l would ask if anyone else has received the warning too. If they have fine, but if not ask them why they believe it's your wife.
I would politely say l'm not happy as l would never do that but then leave it at that.
No they wouldnt necessarily all know the combination, im just saying that its possible someone could gain access. Theres been a local story lately of an ex care worker going into clients she used to visit homes after being fired and stealing, hence the matter is a bit of a hot topic at present. That was for another company.
Im just annoyed that shes been accused based on assumption, no actual evidence0 -
Why does their assumption make sense? Because if you are saying that their "reasonable belief" (the legal term for "assumption") is sensible, why on earth would they want to change their minds about it? All they require in law is reasonable belief she did it. So appealing probably won't change the outcome. And you might want to consider whether it is worth upsetting the applecart / rocking the boat over a verbal warning - the care sector can be notorious for marking peoples cards. But in the end it is her decision.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards