We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Blacklisted

Ok, so DH and colleagues were made redundant following a tupe in August. There is a Tribunal claim (via Union) ongoing for breaches of tupe regulations, but the original employer, whom they tuped from, have now won back the contract. DH has been told verbally that anyone involved in the Tribunal claim have been blacklisted from rejoining the contract as new employees. I though it was illegal to blacklist you for being a Union member? I am more concerned that they may also decide to "blacklist" providing references, leaving a gaping hole in DH employment history and therefore making it diffficult to secure new employment:mad::mad:

Comments

  • Emmzi
    Emmzi Posts: 8,658 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The problem is, how would you prove there was a blacklist?
    Debt free 4th April 2007.
    New house. Bigger mortgage. MFWB after I have my buffer cash in place.
  • Well interestingly enough, one of the men (who isn't a Union member and therefore not involved in the Tribunal) has been re-employed by them again! Talk about actions speaking louder than words! The word "blacklisted" was used by the head of HR when they were contacted about applying for their old jobs!
  • Jarndyce
    Jarndyce Posts: 1,281 Forumite
    Sounds like you are not blacklisted for being a union member, but for being party to a Tribunal claim. Slightly different, but still unlawful. Yes it would be hjard to prove but I think it is worth a further claim. If the original claim has not been heard, then this could be added to it and all the issues heard in the same hearing, so that the tribunal could form a judgement on the whole matter at once. There may not be any written evidence, but it would be fairly clear if all parties to the claim had been refused jobs back in the original company. I suggest you seek the union's advice.
  • Thanks Jarndyce, thats what I thought. Granted, it was said verbally, but the fact someone has been taken back on that is not involved in the Tribunal claim (which is currently stayed) stinks. I am more concerned about DH not getting a reference from them, which will severely hamper his prospects of getting a new job, he worked for them for 5 years so its a big gap too fill.
  • SarEl
    SarEl Posts: 5,683 Forumite
    Jarndyce wrote: »
    Sounds like you are not blacklisted for being a union member, but for being party to a Tribunal claim. Slightly different, but still unlawful. Yes it would be hjard to prove but I think it is worth a further claim. If the original claim has not been heard, then this could be added to it and all the issues heard in the same hearing, so that the tribunal could form a judgement on the whole matter at once. There may not be any written evidence, but it would be fairly clear if all parties to the claim had been refused jobs back in the original company. I suggest you seek the union's advice.

    I am afraid that whilst I symptahise, I am not as sanguine about this advice. Op's DH is no longer in employment - they were made redundant in August. So it would appear that the "former employer" is actually a potential new employer. The law says that your employer (that is, your existing employer) cannot discriminate against you for exercising statutory rights. It says nothing at all about any other employer doing so! So unless the OP's DH can evidence that the former employer is also the existing employer, they may find it hard to win jurisdictional issues. The fact is that if, as an employer, I choose to refuse employment to someone who has taken out an employment tribunal against another employer, there is nothing in the law that stops me doing so. Not that I would - in fact I might be more likely to give them the job!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.