We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Taxpayer to take on mortgage risks of first-time buyers
Comments
-
This will basically have the effect of:
a) increasing supply
b) reducing demand in the secondary market for homes, as FTBers are enticed towards new builds
Downward pressure on house prices is a good thing, right?0 -
Although fundamentally I think it is a poo idea, I don't think it will have any drastic affect on house prices as long as the banks maintain other strict lending criteria such as income multiples and keeping IO mortgages to a very, very low level.0
-
The risk is actually higher than many people will realise, as it's on new builds. Obviously this will push the prices up in the first place, as they have been made more accessible. However, everyone moving in will be in neg equity straight away.
Not really their problem though. It's ours.0 -
I thought part of the problem had been that mortgages were too readily available to people who could not afford them.
So what are the likely consequences of resuming loans to people who can't afford them?This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Oh and our risk is £400m.
Or 3300 homes at around 120k each.0 -
The link wont open for me so can anyone tell me if this only affects FTB in England? Also is it only for FTB buying new builds or any house?0
-
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Only FTB's. Only new builds. Only England.
Game over then0 -
Clifford_Pope wrote: »I thought part of the problem had been that mortgages were too readily available to people who could not afford them.
So what are the likely consequences of resuming loans to people who can't afford them?
Like I said, if the banks maintain other strict lending practices then I doubt it will make a lot of difference.0 -
Banks must be loving it.
First we bail them out. Then we give them QE and wiggle our fingers at them to make sure they use it properly.
When they don't we moan and wiggle our fingers in a more stern fashion and place them on the naughty step.
When the naughty step method doesn't work, we give in and say "oh ok, tell yer what, as you got burnt lending to high risk borrowers, why not pass the buck our way...we'll cover any downsides in risky lending, but you can keep all the upsides..."0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
