We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
When Bankers Were Good: BBC2 Tues 9pm
Comments
-
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Very impressed with the French accent there purch. I'm hopeless at typing anything that doesn't involve standard keys.
Finally got to watch the programme. Other than Hislop's changing and multi-directional hair, there were two things that stood out for me:
1) How many women there were at the helm of banking families in Victorian times.
2) That the average giving to charity was 10% across the country anyway (possibly though not stated as such because the concept of tithing was more commonplace).
Dare I suggest that its not just the bankers getting stingier?Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
vivatifosi wrote: »there were two things that stood out for me:
1) How many women there were at the helm of banking families in Victorian times.
2) That the average giving to charity was 10% across the country anyway (possibly though not stated as such because the concept of tithing was more commonplace).
Dare I suggest that its not just the bankers getting stingier?
1) I wouldn't have said that those women were 'at the helm', they were simply under-employed, and used their spare time to spend the wealth of their husbands on 'good causes' - Elizabeth Fry's husband ws declared bankrupt (these days, he would probably have been bailed out...)
2) I don't recall much detail about 19th century levels of charity-giving. I was surprised by the generalisation
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
I wouldn't have said that those women were 'at the helm', they were simply under-employed, and used their spare time to spend the wealth of their husbands on 'good causes'
ps - if their husbands had owned expensive yachts in the Med, or islands in the Caribbean, then maybe their wives would have behaved differently...
TTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
John_Pierpoint wrote: »[For those who watched the records of the Old Bailey dramatised as Garrow's Law last Sunday].
I must say we have favoured recently by TV, what with that programme, Doc Martin and Merlin, all amongst my favourites.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
ps - if their husbands had owned expensive yachts in the Med, or islands in the Caribbean, then maybe their wives would have behaved differently...
TT
Or maybe they were the equivalent of the career gals of today.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Regarding modern bankers and whether they do or don't believe in Heaven;
Even if bankers had an unusually high level of religiousity, the simple fact is that modern Christians are MUCH less concerned with the after-life and much less likely to talk about it than they would have been in Victorian times. For mainstream Christians, Hell has receaded quietly into the background. People just aren't as concerned with the afterlife anymore (probably because death isn't as close at hand).0 -
Or maybe they were the equivalent of the career gals of today.
Status symbols change with the times - maybe the 19th Century philanthropists achieved higher status from their generosity than from their wealth
Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are possibly in the vanguard of a new beginning, or maybe just a couple of sad old rich guys with nothing else to buy except media coverage
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards