We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Inflation
macaque_2
Posts: 2,439 Forumite
A couple of years ago, we saw Iceland's interest rates forced up. This has been followed by Ireland, Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy. Is the market trying to tell us something?
When people lend money, risk is priced into the borrowing rate. In the case of Italy and Greece, they are borrowing Euros and the Germans with their anti inflation agenda, are resisting QE. In this case, lenders will be paid back with good quality currency but it may only be at 70 cents in the Euro.
Britain is solvent (at the moment) but lenders to HMG are guaranteed to lose 5% of their capital in a year through inflation (and possibly rising). If I was a lender, I would want inflation plus, not inflation minus. The government have also announced a £50b infrasturcture project. If I was a lender, I would not like this.
Is this analysis right or am I missing something? Are we going to wake one of these days to a 'Norman Lamont' moment?
When people lend money, risk is priced into the borrowing rate. In the case of Italy and Greece, they are borrowing Euros and the Germans with their anti inflation agenda, are resisting QE. In this case, lenders will be paid back with good quality currency but it may only be at 70 cents in the Euro.
Britain is solvent (at the moment) but lenders to HMG are guaranteed to lose 5% of their capital in a year through inflation (and possibly rising). If I was a lender, I would want inflation plus, not inflation minus. The government have also announced a £50b infrasturcture project. If I was a lender, I would not like this.
Is this analysis right or am I missing something? Are we going to wake one of these days to a 'Norman Lamont' moment?
0
Comments
-
We could be like Italy with multiple equilibria - given low rates we can pay the interest so the default risk and risk premia stay low.
But if rates were higher the interest bill might become unaffordable leading to higher rates still to cover the default risk and so on spiralling out of control.
However unlike Italy we are in a position to monetize the debt so default would be as you say via inflation and a run on the currency.I think....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
