We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

unenforcability query

Hopefully just a quicky.
I have a default on my credit report from my ex opening an account in my name without my knowledge. I have reported this to the DCA and police and given as much information as possible to them. The DCA was not that interested in resolving the matter and placed a default on my account at the beggining of the year. After months of arguing I sent a template letter letter found on this site requesting a copy of the credit agreement. I have been told by the original lender that they do not have a copy. I recieved a letter from the DCA after the 14 days which states. "the original lender is experiencing a delay in retrieving the information from its archives. Although we have not been able to provide you with the information within the prescribed period, we would still advise that your debt remains legally due"
Is this true? should I still send the follow up template declaring unenforcability? or wait for them to reply?
Any advise would be great.
Many thanks in advance.
Dan

Comments

  • Curr946
    Curr946 Posts: 525 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    No, not legally due. They will have no powers to take you to court or issue a CCJ. But they can default you and can call / write requesting payment.
    If you keep on doing what's you've always done, you'll keep on being what you've always been...:think:
  • fatbelly
    fatbelly Posts: 23,359 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Cashback Cashier
    edited 12 November 2011 at 8:21AM
    'Legally due' doesn't mean 'enforceable'

    I would be careful about firing off any more template letters.

    Your defence against court action, should they try it, and that's unlikely, is 'it's not my debt - it was taken fraudulently in my name'

    A defence of 'they haven't supplied a cca' is more easy to be overturned particularly for post-April 2007 accounts.
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    fatbelly wrote: »
    'Legally due' doesn't mean 'enforceable'

    I would be careful about firing off any more template letters.

    Your defence against court action, should they try it, and that's unlikely, is 'it's not my debt - it was taken fraudulently in my name'

    A defence of 'they haven't supplied a cca' is more easy to be overturned particularly for post-April 2007 accounts.
    I agree. It is also inappropriate to send a CCA request when the debt is not yours. A categoric denial of the debt is what is required. While you mess around with CCA requests, the DCA thinks you are trying to get off on a loophole, so understandably they will not remove the default.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Thanks for the help. The unenforcability aspect is a lttle clearer now. You never know that if they manage to find a CCA it may have her details on it. How should I go about sorting this out then? I have been trying for 3 years now, since I first became aware about the debt. The DCA refuse to do anything despite me giving them a crime ref number and all known contact details for my ex. They say the only way that they will acknowledge a fraud claim is if my ex contacts them and admits the debt is hers. Which is never going to happen. They even had her email address as a contact.
  • chanz4
    chanz4 Posts: 11,057 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Xmas Saver!
    what are the police doing..
    Don't put your trust into an Experian score - it is not a number any bank will ever use & it is generally a waste of money to purchase it. They are also selling you insurance you dont need.
  • The poluce said that they will not pursue it because apparently I am not the victim. The original lender is the victim and I am reporting it on the lenders behalf. Unless the lender reports the fraud it remains as just a report. Crazy world.
  • fatbelly
    fatbelly Posts: 23,359 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Cashback Cashier
    dan19030 wrote: »
    The poluce said that they will not pursue it because apparently I am not the victim. The original lender is the victim and I am reporting it on the lenders behalf. Unless the lender reports the fraud it remains as just a report. Crazy world.

    That's the police's usual attitude - you haven't suffered a 'material loss' so they aren't interested.

    In the meantime, some dodgy debt collection agency is making your life a misery and ruining your credit rating...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.