We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Selling property which has been let

About 12 years ago we bought a property to help transition to retirement and now we want to sell.

The history is that we let it for a couple of years and then lived in it for a couple of years immediately after retirement. We moved to a larger house (relatives kept visiting us for holidays!) and have been letting the original one for the remaining time. The last tenant moved out about 4 months ago and we now have a buyer.

Before events proceed further I want to make sure we are doing all we can to (legally) minimise our tax burden. The property has increased in value by £85k over the 12 years and we have no further capital gains during the current tax year.

Could an expert please advise if there is anything we can do to minimise the tax take and suggest how much this might be?

Thanks.

(Maybe if I'd been an MP I'd possibly have switched houses before selling :D:wink: !!!)
Nice to save.

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    you need to be more spefic

    when did you buy it ... month and year
    when it was let months and years
    when you lived in it months and years

    is it jointly owned?

    as the tax depends upon these things
  • Clapton, thanks for your response. The information you requested is as follows:

    We first bought it June 2000.
    It was let September 2001 'til July 2002
    We retired and lived there August 2002 'til June 2004
    It was let from July 2002 'til July 2011

    The house is jointly owned.

    Thanks for your help.
    Nice to save.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    it works like this

    you are taxed on the profit less allowance expenses less various reliefs

    you need to check the arithmetic . not my strong point

    lets suppose you sell in april 2012
    period of ownership will be 142 months

    the profit (gain ) is assumed equally for each year of ownership

    gain her is 85,000 but you can deduct buying and selling costs; must be worth a couple of grand but I will stick with the 85k


    1. first exemption is the period you lived there plus the last 3 years so 10 +36 months = 46 months

    so exempt is 85,000 x 46/142 = 27,535

    2. then you get letting relief ; the lesser of 40,000 or the period let so in this case 40,000

    so taxable gain is 85,000 - 27,535 -40,000 = 17,464

    3. as it's jointly owned then your gain is 8,732 each

    4. conveniently you each have a capital gains tax allowance of 10,600 per year so assuming you haven't already used it

    then No tax to pay

    don't spend it all at once.

    hope you are enjoying retirement
  • pjclar02
    pjclar02 Posts: 437 Forumite
    Hello there

    I'm afraid I disagree with Clapton's calculations below (although as luck would have it the end result is the same). Specifically, lettings relief is also calculated by reference to the PPR due. As the PPR due in the calculation below is only £27,535, then the maximum lettings relief available would be restricted to £27,535 which in Clapton's calculations would give rise to a taxable gain. However, that said, I think there are also some fundamental arithmetic errors which do also effect the calculation - being that actual ownership appears to be much more than the 10 months used.

    I also think there is some uncertainty in the dates provided by BlueVinney which may need clarification but hopefully will not impact on the end result. You state that the property was let from September 2001 until July 2002, that you then retired and lived in the property from August 2002 to June 2004. You then go on to say that the property was let from July 2002 to July 2011 and this results in an overlap. Presumably this is a typo and you mean from July 2004 to July 2011? Also, what happened with the property between the date of acquisition and the date it was first let - presumably it was empty and not occupied as your main residence?

    If my two assumptions above are correct, you therefore have the following:

    June 00 - August 01 = 15 months vacant
    September 01 - July 02 = 11 months let
    August 02 - June 04 = 23 months occupied
    July 04 - July 11 = 85 months let
    August 11 - November 11 = 4 months vacant

    Total period of ownership = 138 months
    PPR qualification = 59 months (23 months of actual occupation + last 36 months)

    PPR exemption = £85,000 / 138 * 59 = £36,340
    Lettings relief = £36,340

    Total gain = £85,000 - £36,340 - £36,340 = £12,320

    If the property is jointly owned between two individuals (you make references to "we" so I presume this is the case), then as stated by Clatpon the annual exemption from capital gains tax will swallow up this gain and there will be no tax to pay.

    I hope this helps.

    Best wishes

    Paul
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pjclar02 wrote: »
    Hello there

    I'm afraid I disagree with Clapton's calculations below (although as luck would have it the end result is the same). Specifically, lettings relief is also calculated by reference to the PPR due. As the PPR due in the calculation below is only £27,535, then the maximum lettings relief available would be restricted to £27,535 which in Clapton's calculations would give rise to a taxable gain. However, that said, I think there are also some fundamental arithmetic errors which do also effect the calculation - being that actual ownership appears to be much more than the 10 months used.

    I also think there is some uncertainty in the dates provided by BlueVinney which may need clarification but hopefully will not impact on the end result. You state that the property was let from September 2001 until July 2002, that you then retired and lived in the property from August 2002 to June 2004. You then go on to say that the property was let from July 2002 to July 2011 and this results in an overlap. Presumably this is a typo and you mean from July 2004 to July 2011? Also, what happened with the property between the date of acquisition and the date it was first let - presumably it was empty and not occupied as your main residence?

    If my two assumptions above are correct, you therefore have the following:

    June 00 - August 01 = 15 months vacant
    September 01 - July 02 = 11 months let
    August 02 - June 04 = 23 months occupied
    July 04 - July 11 = 85 months let
    August 11 - November 11 = 4 months vacant

    Total period of ownership = 138 months
    PPR qualification = 59 months (23 months of actual occupation + last 36 months)

    PPR exemption = £85,000 / 138 * 59 = £36,340
    Lettings relief = £36,340

    Total gain = £85,000 - £36,340 - £36,340 = £12,320

    If the property is jointly owned between two individuals (you make references to "we" so I presume this is the case), then as stated by Clatpon the annual exemption from capital gains tax will swallow up this gain and there will be no tax to pay.

    I hope this helps.

    Best wishes

    Paul



    Thanks for your contribution

    No accident that we both agree there is no tax payable; it's often the case for relatively low value homes that have a period of principal private residence then the net cgt is either very low or zero.

    A few arithmetic errors in my calculations (as pre-warned) plus a difference of assumptions .. you assume sale in Novemebr 2011 whilst I assume sale in April 2012, plus a few other things


    anyway, welcome to the board, a very valuable addition
  • Glad I can sell it without losing out. I'd thought that all capital gains were now taxed at flat rate.

    Thanks for both putting me on the straight and narrow.
    Nice to save.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.