We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

If you were

the_flying_pig
the_flying_pig Posts: 2,349 Forumite
edited 30 October 2011 at 8:12PM in Debate House Prices & the Economy
*edit - damned smartphone - I'd meant to title the thread something like, 'if you were still in any doubt that the odds were stacked against the young', can't change it now*

From next year (according to page 4 of the Sunday times money pull-out) the rate of interest on student loans will be RPI+3%!!!

They'd be vastly better off getting their parents to MEW and paying them a couple of percentage point premium on top.
FACT.

Comments

  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Love how every charge is RPI.

    But if this is RPI+3%...ouch!
  • After we were promised there would be no "real interest" and student loans would just be worth the same in real terms as when they were taken out. I think it's quite clear that promises and pledges made to students are rarely kept.
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    However, it does seem like a lot of these loans will never be fully repaid.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • pqrdef wrote: »
    However, it does seem like a lot of these loans will never be fully repaid.

    I do wonder, and also how many won't be paid off but the initial sum would have been if it wasn't for the interest. For example - those starting families who have spent several years paying 9% and getting the loan down, take a pay hit to start a family and the loan ends up back to where it was when you graduated as you go back to a job paying over the threshold.
  • FATBALLZ
    FATBALLZ Posts: 5,146 Forumite
    pqrdef wrote: »
    However, it does seem like a lot of these loans will never be fully repaid.

    They aren't meant to be, students loans are simply a mechanism to foist a huge tax hike on the politically powerless, while keeping the boomers and gen x happy.

    Can you imagine the reaction if the government announced income tax was going up 9%? the middle aged middle classes would riot. Much better to create a workaround to achieve the same effect but just on those who don't have enough voting power to do anything about it.
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    FATBALLZ wrote: »
    They aren't meant to be, students loans are simply a mechanism to foist a huge tax hike on the politically powerless, while keeping the boomers and gen x happy.

    Can you imagine the reaction if the government announced income tax was going up 9%? the middle aged middle classes would riot. Much better to create a workaround to achieve the same effect but just on those who don't have enough voting power to do anything about it.

    I believe income tax was over 9% higher in the 70s.
  • FATBALLZ wrote: »
    ........Can you imagine the reaction if the government announced income tax was going up 9%? the middle aged middle classes would riot.....


    Ahem!

    Middle aged, middle classes do not riot.

    They 'have a word' in the right ears and get the thinking reversed.

    The smelly students will either turn into (a) useless, unemployed layabouts with their PPE or 'meeja studies' so-called 'degrees', or (b) people with real jobs and will be part of the middle aged middle classes.

    Class (a) will not have to pay their loans back. Class (b) will be able to afford it.
  • oldvicar
    oldvicar Posts: 1,088 Forumite
    'snot fair
  • Rinoa
    Rinoa Posts: 2,701 Forumite
    *edit - damned smartphone - I'd meant to title the thread something like, 'if you were still in any doubt that the odds were stacked against the young', can't change it now*

    Personally I'd like to see a £1000 tax on every smart phone.

    Clearly anybody who buys one has money to burn.
    If I don't reply to your post,
    you're probably on my ignore list.
  • Rinoa wrote: »
    Personally I'd like to see a £1000 tax on every smart phone.

    Clearly anybody who buys one has money to burn.

    There are well over ten million of them in the uk. My data usage charge is flat £7 per month.
    FACT.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.