Comparison of Magnetic Power Generator to Other Energy Generation Devices

dolamy

As compared to windmill:

To build a windmill one requires the following: a large area, huge investment, maintenance and favorable weather in order to produce energy. The central idea is power generation by wind depends on weather conditions.

Any variations on weather, such as: low wind pressure or bad weather makes the generation system to slow down or stop altogether.

Therefore, the windmill system is an unreliable medium. It is very crucial to maintain the windmill system at regular intervals. In comparison with a Magnetic Generator, we see that Magnetic Generator works without any external help and the weather doesn’t affect its performance at all.

As compared to solar power:

Solar power is derived from solar energy (sunlight) and is not very reliable in the cloudy weather. This source of power solely works under sunlight; equally it needs of a large area for installation. The areas where sunny weather is certain throughout the year is the most appropriate for the solar system. So the above mentioned reasons give a vivid contrast between magnetic and solar power.

As compared to normal fuel generators:

In our comparison between the fuel generators and magnetic power generators, there is a huge difference of cost. Fuel generators require a great amount of fuel as compared to the magnetic power generators. Also maintenance, space for its installation, its sound and repairing of the generator (if needed) are other issues. The purchasing price is also too high to handle. You should keep in mind the possible dangers from it and you will have to prevent the children or pets to go near it. However, the Magnetic Power Generator is easy to use and it saves lot of money and fuel as well.

As comparing with thermal power generators:

These generators consume the biggest area; need lot of money, man power and constant maintenance. It is based on water steam. Also when we compare it with Magnetic Power Generators we come to know that there is a huge difference in cost, space occupation and fuel consumption. Thus, magnetic power generator wins the comparison again.

Let’s discover at: buildmagneticmotor.com

zeupater

dolamy wrote: »

As compared to windmill:

To build a windmill one requires the following: a large area, huge investment, maintenance and favorable weather in order to produce energy. The central idea is power generation by wind depends on weather conditions.

Any variations on weather, such as: low wind pressure or bad weather makes the generation system to slow down or stop altogether.

Therefore, the windmill system is an unreliable medium. It is very crucial to maintain the windmill system at regular intervals. In comparison with a Magnetic Generator, we see that Magnetic Generator works without any external help and the weather doesn’t affect its performance at all.

As compared to solar power:

Solar power is derived from solar energy (sunlight) and is not very reliable in the cloudy weather. This source of power solely works under sunlight; equally it needs of a large area for installation. The areas where sunny weather is certain throughout the year is the most appropriate for the solar system. So the above mentioned reasons give a vivid contrast between magnetic and solar power.

As compared to normal fuel generators:

In our comparison between the fuel generators and magnetic power generators, there is a huge difference of cost. Fuel generators require a great amount of fuel as compared to the magnetic power generators. Also maintenance, space for its installation, its sound and repairing of the generator (if needed) are other issues. The purchasing price is also too high to handle. You should keep in mind the possible dangers from it and you will have to prevent the children or pets to go near it. However, the Magnetic Power Generator is easy to use and it saves lot of money and fuel as well.

As comparing with thermal power generators:

These generators consume the biggest area; need lot of money, man power and constant maintenance. It is based on water steam. Also when we compare it with Magnetic Power Generators we come to know that there is a huge difference in cost, space occupation and fuel consumption. Thus, magnetic power generator wins the comparison again.

Let’s discover at: buildmagneticmotor.com

As comparing with other perpetual motion devices:

:rotfl::rotfl: ..... lets not really confuse a free energy source based on perpetual motion with a near-frictionless magnetic bearing ..... add sufficient kinetic energy (a push) and the system (usually high mass) will seem to run with no energy source for a long time, but add a load (generation) and the system will soon stop as the kinetic energy is converted to electromagnetic energy, this is similar to magnetic braking systems used on wind turbines ... increase the load, increase the braking capacity ....

HTH
Z

penrhyn

Its not half as good as a Mk 111 Metagobaliser, and Interocitor monitor.

Hungerdunger

So this miraculous motor will help you:

Fire the Greedy electric companies and produce your own free electricity!

Now I don't doubt that the electric companies are greedy, so why have they not invested their considerable profits in industrial versions of this magnetic motor, so that they can make even more money???

penrhyn

Same reason the pharmacutical companies have suppressed the cure for the common cold.
..and now a song from the Stonecutters!

Who controls the British crown?
Who keeps the metric system down?
We do! We do!
Who leaves Atlantis off the maps?
Who keeps the Martians under wraps?
We do! We do!
Who holds back the electric car?
Who makes Steve Gutenberg a star?
We do! We do!
Who robs cave fish of their sight?
Who rigs every Oscar night?
We do! We do!

zeupater

There's a video on the web somewhere with a guy describing one of these systems where part of the narrative states that the generator needs power but generates five times what is put in ..... my question would be ... if you're generating five times the energy input, why do you need to input any energy, surely 20% of the generation could be used to power the system ? ....


I wonder how the camp is split on this one, do the believers in anthropological carbondioxide causing climate change include, as a subset, those who also believe in this form of generation ..... or would they side with those who are a little more sceptical, I doubt it .... :rotfl:

Bet some will be taken in though ... :wall:
Z

moonrakerz

penrhyn wrote: »

Its not half as good as a Mk 111 Metagobaliser, and Interocitor monitor.

Sooo yesterday.

Got this off ebay, £29.99 - brilliant............. powers the whole house and I export enough to power half of my town too.......... Honest !

zeupater

moonrakerz wrote: »

Sooo yesterday.

Got this off ebay, £29.99 - brilliant............. powers the whole house and I export enough to power half of my town too.......... Honest !

mmmmm .... superheated water :think: ... bet it makes a great cuppa too

Does your version need demineralised water or is it the version which just evaporates the minerals and vents through the window ? ..... :search:ah, I see now it must be the latter ... the venting heat has kept the flowers in bloom ..... I want one

noncom_2

zeupater wrote: »

I wonder how the camp is split on this one, do the believers in anthropological carbondioxide causing climate change include, as a subset, those who also believe in this form of generation ..... or would they side with those who are a little more sceptical, I doubt it .... :rotfl:

Bet some will be taken in though ... :wall:
Z

Not quite sure what point you're trying to make, Z, but as a "believer in anthropological carbon dioxide causing climate change" (disclaimer: not being an expert, merely a well scientifically educated lay person, and recognising that there is good and bad science on both sides of the debate, I feel the overwhelming weight of evidence supports the human-influenced climate change conclusion), I can put myself very firmly in the camp of sceptic on these nonsensical free power generators.

My personal favourite is the claim (from another of these type of devices) that you can build one yourself, and it will provide free energy for ever, enough to cut your electricity bill by a third!!!!! They never answered the question as to why you can't just build one three times as big and cut your electricity bill entirely. Presumably they thought such an unrealistic claim would make it sound stupid, lol. :rotfl:

Anyway, if your implication is that people who believe in human contribution to climate change are scientifically illiterate, naive or stupid, I've seen no evidence to support this. Perhaps, in the interests of science, you could show us some?

Andy