We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New Buy to Let Boom Fuelled By Higher Rents

1356789

Comments

  • Old_Git
    Old_Git Posts: 4,751 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! Cashback Cashier
    geneer wrote: »
    How can you say this Chuck.

    I believe its previously acknowledged that all bulls who bought within the bubble did so with a life time base rate +0.25% tracker.

    I mean they all keep saying it so it must be true. :rotfl:

    I got base rate +0.16% ,very nice ,ok for the moment
    "Do not regret growing older, it's a privilege denied to many"
  • Percy1983
    Percy1983 Posts: 5,244 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    In short the incentives should be removed form BTL, if you ant th asset a the end you should pay for at least some of it, capped rents would go a long way to sorting this.
    Have my first business premises (+4th business) 01/11/2017
    Quit day job to run 3 businesses 08/02/2017
    Started third business 25/06/2016
    Son born 13/09/2015
    Started a second business 03/08/2013
    Officially the owner of my own business since 13/01/2012
  • Percy1983 wrote: »
    In short the incentives should be removed form BTL, if you ant th asset a the end you should pay for at least some of it, capped rents would go a long way to sorting this.

    I think if the government hinder private rental too much then there would be a huge risk that there simply wouldn't be the option for those that choose to rent.

    It was the governments choice to sell off social housing and it's been policy since to utilise private rental to fill the void.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    geneer wrote: »
    Who says I have a problem with it.

    I mean you're constantly hounded about the finer details of your financial arrangements, its no surpise that eventually, under much duress your forced to pass this information on.

    At every avaliable opportunity. :)

    The reason I mentioned it was that it showed why you were incorrect, (which seems to have gone over your head). However I must admit I really do enjoy annoying you (who wouldn't?) and its plain to see that people on low margin trackers really annoys you.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 October 2011 at 6:57PM
    Old_Git wrote: »
    I got base rate +0.16% ,very nice ,ok for the moment


    Oh dear! That's even lower than the rate geneer suggested as typical! More bad news for him then.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • julieq
    julieq Posts: 2,603 Forumite
    Removing incentives for private BTL landlords would be utterly counterproductive. It's actually good for renters that there are lots of landlords with small numbers of properties competing for their business and scared of void periods. If you get to a situation where it's not attractive for smaller investors to rent houses out you're going to see the big corporates steaming in and setting rents on a hard nosed business basis. Beware of what you wish for.

    And if you think that rent caps are going to come in at a level that will force landlords out of the market, you're in cloud cuckoo land. The BEST you'd get is current market rates plus inflation. Squeeze landlords on rent and you get cost cutting in other directions anyway. Costs do get passed on one way or another.

    Honestly, you can fiddle around all you like at the margins and try to invent ways of penalising people you don't like, but the only way you solve this problem is to build more houses. Until then the cost of decent quality accomodation is going to go up.
  • geneer
    geneer Posts: 4,220 Forumite
    edited 25 October 2011 at 7:30PM
    The reason I mentioned it was that it showed why you were incorrect, (which seems to have gone over your head).

    Of course, of course.
    Otherwise you would never have brought it up.
    Yet Again.
    However I must admit I really do enjoy annoying you (who wouldn't?) and its plain to see that people on low margin trackers really annoys you.

    Hmmmmm. I'm annoyed? Yet you're the one compelled to dish out your private financial details. Allegedly.
    Ok then.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    geneer wrote: »
    Of course, of course.
    Otherwise you would never have brought it up.
    Yet Again.

    Oh dear! you are still yet again swerving the point that you were wrong. Are you just going to concede that point to me then?
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • geneer
    geneer Posts: 4,220 Forumite
    Oh dear! you are still yet again swerving the point that you were wrong. Are you just going to concede that point to me then?

    Wrong about what Chuck?
    Incorrect about what?
    Do please be specific.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 October 2011 at 7:43PM
    geneer wrote: »
    Wrong about what Chuck?
    Incorrect about what?
    Do please be specific.

    I was very specific in post 3 (which you answered but ignored my point, so don't pretend you haven't read it).

    EDIT: It just ocurred to me that you may be that financially unaware that you can't see that buying in 2007 on a low margin tracker is better than buying at todays prices with today's mortgages, please tell you that you are not that daft. I thought you were not commenting because you knew that you were incorrect and I was only joking about it going over your head. This is priceless!
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.