Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

HSBC targets the FTB

1235»

Comments

  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    DervProf wrote: »
    I would have liked to pay 4.59% during the lifetime of my mortgage.

    And as some would probably point out, paying 4.59% is going to be cheaper than renting in most cases.

    Seems like some of you want your cake and eat it too.

    If the banks offered lower rates, then savers would suffer more. Not only that, lower rates will simply fuel HPI which will increase the future requirement for continual low rates and higher amounts of lending. If you cast your mind back to just 4 years ago, you'll see where that may lead.

    The base rate is 0.5%, base rate a few years ago was 5%. + 4.09% would means then I would have been paying around 9% - was that a good deal back then? I highly doubt it!

    The rates they are offering are crap, simple as. I'm not trying to have my cake and eat it, I want to have a reasonably priced cake, and eat it ;)
    DervProf wrote: »
    Fair enough. Like any "free market" product, there will be good deals, not so good deals, and bad deals. If HSBC are trying to attract customers with a bad deal, then they are probably not going to be very successful.

    If we talk about MSErs they would fail entirely, but we live in Britain and there sure are some stupid/lazy people out there who won't search for the best deal :)
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    Lokolo wrote: »
    The base rate is 0.5%, base rate a few years ago was 5%. + 4.09% would means then I would have been paying around 9% - was that a good deal back then? I highly doubt it!

    The rates they are offering are crap, simple as. I'm not trying to have my cake and eat it, I want to have a reasonably priced cake, and eat it ;)

    As you say, base rate a few years back was ~5% and I recall SVRs being around base + ~1.5%, meaning that SVRs were around 6.5% and "deals" may have been around 5%. Times have changed, the economy is in a mess, and the banks are recapitalising. The BoE may have slashed rates to 0.5%, but it is the banks who call the shots. I didn't hear too many FTBers and existing mortgage holders complaining a few years back when the banks were offering all sorts of wizzo mortgage deals that helped fuel a house price boom. I suspected that the banks would get themselves into trouble, but when I mentioned this to a few people they simply implied that I didn't know what i was talking about, and returned to working out how much their house had gone up in the past month. The banks did get into trouble, and it is both borrowers and savers who are paying the price.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.