We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Taxpayers nursing £32bn loss on Lloyds
Comments
-
velocity of money <00
-
-
Why there will be more prints prints. They are crystallizing the gains in house prices that paid for the boomers cushy existence 2001—2008.0
-
So, should we start selling?
If not, what's with all the celebration? Were still just as exposed! The share price does seem to be be somehwat rapidly increasing however. Expect the same again if (when) the US debt ceiling is lifted again?
I;ve read the break even point for Lloyds for the taxpayer is actually 74p and 51p for RBS.
Can't seem to hodl the FTSE100 back at the moment either. Theres certainly a lot of optimism around.0 -
Investing for the pre 2015 election sugar rush...0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »So, should we start selling?
If not, what's with all the celebration? Were still just as exposed! The share price does seem to be be somehwat rapidly increasing however. Expect the same again if (when) the US debt ceiling is lifted again?
Not suggesting that we break out the Champagne. The taxpayer is still nursing large paper losses. However, the near doubling of the Lloyds in 2012 is certainly one of the biggest good news stories that's not made it to the mainstream media.
I'm fairly sure if we'd seen the share price half it would have received more attention. No doubt some would be posting links from thisismoney.co.uk showing nice graphics with dynamite attached to clocks.
The government shouldn't be in the business of owning banks nor trying to time the sale based on their investment views. Maybe they should sell at the first opportunity that presents itself after the banks(s) are considered secure. That might mean a loss but the bail outs were meant to be about stability and not profit.0 -
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Why not retain a holding? Hong Kong has retained a stake in HSBC.
Could do lots of things - just seems a little quiet in terms of government comment.0 -
Government have not lost anything...yet.
I'm currently sitting on a shed load of RBS stock from when it was selling for 24p! Bought them up like there was no tomorrow!
The Government will get their money back, just not any time soon!
A.G0 -
why is that?
Supply and demand, gov cant just dump shares and expect the price to hold up. When the barclays arab guy sold some, the price dropped 60p overnight. It did recover but the market is more of a liquid then a solid and the price is just the surface
What was suggested was gov setup up a trust then sell shares in that to pension funds, so rbs and lloyds sold together as an asset. It would help if they paid a divThrugelmir wrote: »Why not retain a holding? Hong Kong has retained a stake in HSBC.
In communist China. Why dont we do that, perhaps because we have alot of debt to repay. Its a compromised situation also to regulate something that is ours, china wouldnt mind that0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
