We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Compulsory S32 Pension for non-existant wife !

2»

Comments

  • You won't find the Guaranteed Annuity Rate in any of the documentation, for obvious reasons they don't publicise it. Write to them and ask them if your policy contains a GAR and if so what is it. Also ask if this GAR is dependant on you taking the pension at the retirement date.
    If you're policy is the same as mine there are bonuses added to the policy every year; since they have been taken over they have been £0 (no surprise in that I suppose), but there will be a 'terminal bonus' added at retirement date; my guess is that if you don't take the pension at the said date, you'll lose that also (if of course there is any to come)
    And yes Annuity rates are <5% and going down, therfore 9.8% might be worth more than taking your money somewhere else to lose the mysterious spouse.
    You could of course ask them what the pension would be without the liability of a wife?
    Paul
  • trina2010
    trina2010 Posts: 487 Forumite
    PaulCooper wrote: »
    You won't find the Guaranteed Annuity Rate in any of the documentation, for obvious reasons they don't publicise it. Write to them and ask them if your policy contains a GAR and if so what is it. Also ask if this GAR is dependant on you taking the pension at the retirement date.
    If you're policy is the same as mine there are bonuses added to the policy every year; since they have been taken over they have been £0 (no surprise in that I suppose), but there will be a 'terminal bonus' added at retirement date; my guess is that if you don't take the pension at the said date, you'll lose that also (if of course there is any to come)
    And yes Annuity rates are <5% and going down, therfore 9.8% might be worth more than taking your money somewhere else to lose the mysterious spouse.
    You could of course ask them what the pension would be without the liability of a wife?
    Paul

    we are talking GMP not GAR, 2 completely different things.
    you cannot remove the spouses pension from GMP at this stage, so it is not possible to remove the 'liability' of a wife as it as all costed in at the beginning of the policy and makes no difference if it will be paid or not to what OP would receive.

    OP the GMP amount you gave, i assume that is the value and not the per annum figure? do you have the per annum figure? if not you should be able to get it over the phone from your provider

    Household 2 adults, 2 cats and baby boy (2.11.13)
    Married my wonderful husband on 2nd June 2012
    June GC: 0/300
  • trina2010
    trina2010 Posts: 487 Forumite
    im fairly sure flexible t plans dont have GAR but ill check tomorrow and come back with an answer

    Household 2 adults, 2 cats and baby boy (2.11.13)
    Married my wonderful husband on 2nd June 2012
    June GC: 0/300
  • castle96
    castle96 Posts: 3,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    your GMP revalued to SPA (though pol is written to age 60) is

    accrued prior to 4/88 Members pension pa £773 Spouces £386
    " after " Nil Nil
    toal £733 £386
  • trina2010
    trina2010 Posts: 487 Forumite
    ok so GMP per annum amount of £773 from a pot of £6191 approx.
    hopefully 1 of our helpful IFAs may be along to confirm in a short while but that certainly looks like a good return to me for what you have value wise.

    Household 2 adults, 2 cats and baby boy (2.11.13)
    Married my wonderful husband on 2nd June 2012
    June GC: 0/300
  • opti_mist
    opti_mist Posts: 1 Newbie
    edited 14 October 2011 at 3:35AM
    Very interesting situation and I don't understand any of the technicalities or jargon as very new to the concept of pensions, so this is just a suggestion: Would it be possible of offering someone (me perhaps!!? :) ) the opportunity of being a nominal 'wife' I have no idea whether this would be permitted or workable.
  • castle96
    castle96 Posts: 3,010 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    thanksthe offer optimis, but I would have to be legally married to you (and dead),, for you to benefit. Can't yet see the plus side for me !
  • Zelazny
    Zelazny Posts: 387 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    opti_mist wrote: »
    Very interesting situation and I don't understand any of the technicalities or jargon as very new to the concept of pensions, so this is just a suggestion: Would it be possible of offering someone (me perhaps!!? :) ) the opportunity of being a nominal 'wife' I have no idea whether this would be permitted or workable.
    This isn't something you can fake. You would need to actually get married. They will require the marriage certificate before any benefits are paid to the wife. If you want to claim that you are "partners" then you usually have to provide proof that the partner is dependant on the deceased (joint utility bills, or proof that you live together and that the deceased pays the bills for example) before any spouse's benefit is paid, if the rules even allow for unmarried partners.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.