We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
More bank regulation?
Comments
-
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »And the largest bank in the world is 84% nationalised............
....and 93% of statistics are made up on the spot! Which bank, which nation, what does 'largest' mean?
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
It's bad luck to speak its name, but we can just mention it as "the Scottish bank".....and 93% of statistics are made up on the spot! Which bank, which nation, what does 'largest' mean?"It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0 -
In the Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae lawsuit against the banks, including some British banks, it's alleged that those involved in the subprime racket were aware of the potentially calamitous consequences of what they were up to, but carried on regardless. Is that what you want to defend?
No, and I'm sure that banking has it's fair share of scumbags. Am just saying that the constant vilification of bankers by MPs is hypocritical in the extreme. They're simply siezing on a soft target because any lazy Question Time MP or Union rep knows they only have to start slagging "greeeeedy bankers" to get a few claps from the audience (not much else any of them say get's applause).
Many members of the public who slag bankers were only too delighted to take advantage of precisely the cheap loans & mortgages that led to the credit crunch.0 -
That's politics. Get it wrong and you set yourself up to be always good for a cheap shot.Am just saying that the constant vilification of bankers by MPs is hypocritical in the extreme.
The bankers didn't cause the depression - that was caused by the emergence of China and America's mismanagement of its industrial decline. The bankers merely saw the opportunity presented by circumstances and set out to milk it, with a complete lack of any sense of social responsibility.
Of course. But it's not their job to be financial experts. It's the bankers who get paid to run the business.Many members of the public who slag bankers were only too delighted to take advantage of precisely the cheap loans & mortgages that led to the credit crunch."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0 -
Many members of the public who slag bankers were only too delighted to take advantage of precisely the cheap loans & mortgages that led to the credit crunch.
If somebody stops you in the street and hands you a wad of money, what do you do?
If you have any sense, you walk on by, and possibly call the emergency services
But what if he or she wears a suit, and wears a badge from your trusted High Street Bank?
We trusted them, and, in return, they milk us dry
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
If somebody stops you in the street and hands you a wad of money, what do you do?
If you have any sense, you walk on by, and possibly call the emergency services
But what if he or she wears a suit, and wears a badge from your trusted High Street Bank?
We trusted them, and, in return, they milk us dry
TruckerT
I'm not sure that analogy bears much resemblence to the truth which was people lying left right & centre on self-cert mortgages.
Yes the banks let them but that doesn't make it "all the banks fault" which is what lots of people like to claim. If I kick you in the face & you let me that doesn't make it your fault.0 -
I'm not sure that analogy bears much resemblence to the truth which was people lying left right & centre on self-cert mortgages.
Yes the banks let them but that doesn't make it "all the banks fault" which is what lots of people like to claim. If I kick you in the face & you let me that doesn't make it your fault.
This is going to become a very garbled 'mixed metaphor'!
If you were kicking me in the face, and your foot started to hurt, then you would probably realise that it was time to stop
The banks were actually kicking themselves in the face, but still they carried on
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards