We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Speed Limits, Road Safety, Technological Change, Economic Growth
Comments
-
-
Tescos lorries do seem to be the ones that never go above 40 mph on single carriageways. Other supermarket's lorries do seem to go rather quicker0
-
Isn't there a campaign to raise the speed on single carriageways to 50mph for trucks? It would certainly help ease the frustration for car drivers of having to do 40, when their legal limit is 60mph.0
-
Surely reducing journey times means that vehicles are on the road network for less time, so there are less of them on the roads at any one time reducing congestion.
It is bad driving that causes accidents, and to stop that we need far more police on the roads in unmarked patrol cars. Driving too fast for the road conditions (whatever the legal speed limit), tailgating, dangerous manoeuvres etc are things which are ignored by speed cameras and are the major contributors to accidents. Driving standards need to be enforced by having traffic police out on the roads."When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson0 -
MacMickster wrote: »Surely reducing journey times means that vehicles are on the road network for less time, so there are less of them on the roads at any one time reducing congestion.
It's actually the reverse, higher speed limits cause more congestion - the faster the traffic is allowed to go then the more likely it is to cause bottlenecks.
Raising the speed limit will just give those drivers who currently drive at 80mph an excuse to drive at 90mph instead.0 -
If they used the technology of speed cameras to automatically limit vehicle speeds, they would lose all their income from speeding fines
At 1.8 million a pop, how many fatalities do you think you'd need to save?0 -
It's actually the reverse, higher speed limits cause more congestion - the faster the traffic is allowed to go then the more likely it is to cause bottlenecks.
Raising the speed limit will just give those drivers who currently drive at 80mph an excuse to drive at 90mph instead.
That can be the case on motorways and dual carriageways BUT only when the roads are already congested AND if people drive like idiots (see heavy traffic ahead but decide to drive at speed right up to it, slam on the breaks, tailgate the car in front who would obviously go faster themselves if they were not in traffic). This is why more traffic police are needed to either educate the nutters or get them off the roads."When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson0 -
Move it to 50mph and have the limits for trucks GPRS enforced.
I had a neighbour killed in her car (mid 20's) by a trucker who could not make it round a corner on a Single Carriage way (basically the truck took the corner too fast, too fast would be way over 40mph).
So Increase the speed, but ban all those that don't comply by using GPRS.
I am all for increasing speed limits if complying standards are increased also.
It will get all the bad drivers off the roads.0 -
MacMickster wrote: »Surely reducing journey times means that vehicles are on the road network for less time, so there are less of them on the roads at any one time reducing congestion.
It is bad driving that causes accidents, and to stop that we need far more police on the roads in unmarked patrol cars. Driving too fast for the road conditions (whatever the legal speed limit), tailgating, dangerous manoeuvres etc are things which are ignored by speed cameras and are the major contributors to accidents. Driving standards need to be enforced by having traffic police out on the roads.
I agree, getting pulled over was standard procedure 20 years ago, even for minor stuff.
Police were visable nearly all the time. Now they are non to be seen, that has now turned into people pulling out on islands in front of traffic to save time.
People using right hand lanes to go left to save time etc etc.
The list goes on, standard have dived and the amount of dangerous manovers have gone up.0 -
Just ban the imports of audi A4s, all BMWs, range rovers and Volvo Xc90s.
In a couple of years road safety would have doubled.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards