We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
missold mortgage
Options
Comments
-
So sorry Kingstreet I'm pretty new to this so have obviously pressed a wrong button. If regulation wasn't until 2004 then it looks like I don't have a case.
But many thanks to everyone for the advice0 -
kingstreet wrote: »momo - you are having "35 years" and "mortgage into retirement" mentioned because you hijacked lhandbury's thread instead of starting your own. We're trying to deal with two different cases here so it's getting confusing!
Oops .... thanks Kings ... wipe everything from your mind about 35 yrs and your retirement ... :rotfl::rotfl:
With respect to your mortgage - mortgage advice & suitability only became regulated wef 31 Oct 2004 onwards (kindly reminded to us, with thanks, by O4U).
H x0 -
So sorry Kingstreet I'm pretty new to this so have obviously pressed a wrong button. If regulation wasn't until 2004 then it looks like I don't have a case.
But many thanks to everyone for the advice
To start a thread, hit the "new thread" button to the left of the title of the respective board such as "Mortgages & Endowments."
You've replied in someone else's thread here.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Worse off because we had to pay a redemption penalty of £2262.65 and a deeds handling charge of £85.00 plus the monies we received were 103, 050 the mortgage was for 104, 811.00 so I assume that this included additional arrangement fees. I'm not really sure if we have a case or not.
This was an insurance premium you paid to protect the lender when they were lending more than they wished. It was charged on the excess over 75%.
For example, if you bought a property for £115,000 with a 95% mortgage, Abbey would charge you as follows;-
95% mortgage = £109,250 less
75% of value = £86,250
Amount to insure = £23,000 x 8% premium rate = £1,840 premium.
Does that sound familiar?
As has been suggested earlier, you need to get together all the documentation given to you when you moved and took out the new mortgage. Read what it says. If you need any more guidance, post back here.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Hi thanks for all your advice, that does sound familiar. Luckily I have learnt to look into contracts in more detail since 10 years ago. Following the advice you have given it does look like we don't have a claim but it still feels unfair that Abbey charged us that amount when we were taking out another mortgage for a higher amount with them. I wish I'd have negotiated further at the time but we just accepted that that was they way of mortgages.
Kind regards0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards