We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Neo-Capitalism
Comments
-
I don't dispute that RBS (and others) were involved - not my specialist area, I freely admit - but you're not suggesting US government home loan policy wasn't at the root, are you? It might make a good controversial book if you are.
Simply put. Appears they were sold "rubbish" by the large investment banks. Empty cornfields which had no buildings on, same property was included multiple times. No credit checking applicants income etc etc.
Hence the legal action to recover losses from the banks.
Going to take a while for the dust to settle on the financial crash. The legacy of Lehmans has yet to unwind.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Banks became retailers. Trouble was the basic rules of risk were forgotten in the stampede for growth and market share. Now the tables are turned
I am not aware of any other arm of the retail trade which systematically handed out all its assets to any passer-by in the street, on the strength of an empty promise to 'pay later'
And I'm not sure about the table-turning - the banks still seem to me to have a stranglehold on the wealth of nations - the whole euro bailout thing seems to hinge upon the banks getting another massive injection of taxpayers' money
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
[QUOTE=TruckerT;47310053
And I'm not sure about the table-turning[/QUOTE]
That reference is in context of banks employing "bank managers" again. Banking was very different not so long ago.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Banking was very different not so long ago
You have hit the nail upon it's head!
Banking behaviour has changed beyond recognition, bit it still clings to it's power and wealth
Traditionally, banks provided the necessary lubricants which oiled the wheels of capitalism and in return they came to enjoy enormous power and wealth
But they no longer fulfil their accepted function
So it is time for us to find an alternative
The banks should be brought under the control of one of the many global institutions which talk a lot, but have no power. The banks' assets should be confiscated, and used to repair the damage which the banks have done, and continue to do
That's what I mean by 'neo-capitalism'
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
You have hit the nail upon it's head!
Banking behaviour has changed beyond recognition, bit it still clings to it's power and wealth
Traditionally, banks provided the necessary lubricants which oiled the wheels of capitalism and in return they came to enjoy enormous power and wealth
But they no longer fulfil their accepted function
So it is time for us to find an alternative
The banks should be brought under the control of one of the many global institutions which talk a lot, but have no power. The banks' assets should be confiscated, and used to repair the damage which the banks have done, and continue to do
That's what I mean by 'neo-capitalism'
TruckerT
Banks used to go bust all the time a century ago.
It just tended to be a bit more local.0 -
-
-
According to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0
-
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »The box may look the same. However the contents inside are changing daily. Every small incremental change implemented now. Will have a profound influence in 10 years time. Maybe a box or two crushed along the way.
Nah, the contents inside remain the same, time to look elsewhere
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards