Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Recipe for disaster

bengasman
bengasman Posts: 601 Forumite
edited 24 September 2011 at 12:39PM in Debate House Prices & the Economy
If the statement in this article is correct, it is not a matter of "will the banks survive", but "HOW LONG will the banks survive for".
Any first year economics student knows that the described principle is like playing Russian roulette; it does not matter how lucky you are, at some point the trigger will hit a live round.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/banks-brokers-plunge-twist-reality-sinks-140255226.html


The specific item I am referring to, is the principle of borrowing short whilst lending long; it is the epitome of greed over business sense.
As long as interest rates are stable or going down, it is money for nothing. When interest rates go up, the margins get smaller and smaller until finally the company pays more interest for the money they have to borrow to satisfy the contracts for what they have lent.
As a result, they have 3 choices:
  1. Renege on the borrower, and somehow cancel the loan.
  2. Swallow the loss.
  3. Get a bail out from the taxpayer.


When all 3 have failed, they go bust.

Comments

  • macaque_2
    macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
    Governments are far too protective of banks. I accept there is a compelling need for traditional banking services but we don't get that.

    Over the past 25 years, banks have reinvented themselves into organisations that skim the public (see countless examples of excessive charges and misselling) and use the proceeds to gamble.

    We need are plain vanilla banking services ring fenced from speculation.
  • TruckerT
    TruckerT Posts: 1,714 Forumite
    I reckon the only reasons for the banks' continuing presence in the 'retail' market are historical ones - they only make it pay by charging extortionate amounts for their services, whilst claiming that their services are free (.....subject to terms and conditions.....)

    Banks are businesses like any other, and should have been allowed to collapse (like so many other businesses have collapsed in the wake of the bank bailouts) - unfortunately, the banks continue to control pretty well all the money that is, or is not, in circulation in the world, but are unanswerable to any government or any electorate

    That is what needs to change

    TruckerT
    According to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 241.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 618.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.1K Life & Family
  • 254.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.