We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

help! contentious probate problem

13»

Comments

  • Bossyboots
    Bossyboots Posts: 6,760 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The 50/50 split on divorce is only a starting point and there is absolutely nothing to say he would have achieved that percentage as a divorce settlement.

    I really cannot see that his case has any merit either and I agree this is a try on for more in the hope of it being settled out of court.
  • prudryden
    prudryden Posts: 2,075 Forumite
    jasmine wrote:
    Thanks for the replies, they were married by the way for 20 years; a second marriage for him and a first for my g-aunt.They had no children..I've now been informed by my brother that his solicitors have written asking for my personal details..no doubt i'll have to provide bank statements etc to prove how much I live on..(i'm more likey to be found reading debt-free wanabee)
    I'll pick the letter up tomorrow and let you know..[/quote

    Remember, you are the defendant in this case. All the proof lies with the plantive. He needs to challenge the validity of the will. Just because he doesn't think the distribution is fair is NOT a valid reason and will be thrown out. YOU HAVE THE WILL. That, for the moment is all you need. A probate lawyer shouldn't cost as much as you were quoted (£180/hr is London City rates for a partner of a smallish firm). But this can be claimed back from the plantive if he loses, especially if the judge rules that it is a frivolous or vindictive case.
    If he starts bringing in medical doctors, psychiatrist etc. that will testify that your grandaunt was incompetent on the very day, hour, minute she signed the will - then you have a real case to contend with.
    I am very surprised that someone who is 81 yrs. old is taking this action, unless it is vindictive. It can be very messy and stressful for him, as he has to try and prove his case.
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.