We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Debt Collectors Practices

124»

Comments

  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    One thing for your daughter to watch out for is that a charge may be made fore each visit. She should dispute any charges that are made for visits after the one where you told him that she no longer lives there.
  • Debt Collectors have to give sufficient notice, along with a time and a date they will be calling. They never do this, they just turn up unannounced.

    If they don't leave when requested they are trespassing.

    If they step foot on your land without authorisation then they are trespassing, and under Common Law the landowner has the right to remove them, or have them removed.

    Actually they always do this. It's part of their normal letter strategy that states something like 'failure to respond may result in a represenative calling at your home blah, blah, blah' or words to that effect.

    It's been debated on here previously and I don't think anyone agreed. There was even mention of how you cannot restrict someones access to you without a court ordrer etc including denying them the right to call you. Most importantly though are the debt collection guidleines quoted above which clearly state the circumstances that collectors can visit and what they must do if it's not convenient etc. So as the oft seem to agree that these visits can take place I would like to see an individual challenge this in court and see if they get anywhere.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Hanky Panky, there are two aspects, first this from the OFT guidelines:

    2.12 Examples of unfair practices are: ...
    d. entering a property uninvited


    Second the right to notify someone that you have withdrawn their common law right of access across your property to get to your door and ring your doorbell, a technique that is used sometimes for TV licensing visitors, who will honour such a withdrawing of permission, at least until or if they decide to use court action.

    You don't need a court order to deny someone permission to cross your land. You'll find that shops quite often deny known shop lifters or troublemakers access to the store.

    For debt collection this won't work with a bailiff who has been authorised by a court to act. Others can stick to letters.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.