We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

CTG and using funds ti increase the value of an asset during probate

Just wanted to clarify something. In inheritance a house is valued at £140,000, the 2 beneficiaries who are also the executors want to use their money to improve the value of the house before selling. Their output of £6500 could bring them an increase on the sale price to £160,000.

What or how would these figures be calculated for Tax purposes. Does the outlay get taken away before Tax is applied to the gain of £20,000.

Comments

  • Any thoughts??:)
  • SeniorSam
    SeniorSam Posts: 1,673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 12 September 2011 at 9:28PM
    Hi Nad1611,

    The £140,000 value of the estate is just that. No more or less and the value is passed on to the two beneficiaries. With the proposal that the property is improved and then sold, the added value for improvements will be taken off the sale price, but the overall gain will be split between the two beneficiaries. They will have their own GCT allowances so it may be that no CGT will be payable if the gain is within the limits.

    If you are doing this before distribution the the beneficiaries, speak with the Probate office who will clarify matters for you

    Sam
    I'm a retired IFA who specialised for many years in Inheritance Tax, Wills and Trusts. I cannot offer advice now, but my comments here and on Legal Beagles as Sam101 are just meant to be helpful. Do ask questions from the Members who are here to help.
  • nad1611
    nad1611 Posts: 710 Forumite
    Thank you. That seems sensible.As you say I'll clarify further.
  • Cover your backs with a "memorandum of appropriation"; you need to make it clear that the improvements and sale of the property is the idea of the beneficiaries, its new joint owners, not the executors desperate to pay some probate debts, while not being a venture in trade by a partnership of property developers - you don't do this regularly for a living?
    [In the case of my sister and I, selling our deceased mother's house, we transferred the house into our own names as it was the end of an interest in possession ("life interest") situation and we did not want extra questions about the legal ownership from buyers, about a house still owned by our father's executors;). Then we sold it (to a property developer). I got some queries from the tax people when submitting my tax return, my sister's identical return sailed through no questions asked.]
    Similar discussion here:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/46765699#Comment_46765699

    John.

    Just for the record, since a couple of years ago, the Land Registry expects land held by trustees to have its owner ship (re)registered when a trustee dies - ie you fill in a form and pay a fee if you have an old executor who dies or needs replacing through age/ infirmity.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.