We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is economics a science, or just a dinner-party? ....
Comments
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Because when the perfect storm strikes and prices turn totally red across the all the exchanges boards without exception. There is only one outcome......... loss. As was the case in 2008.
Nobody had factored that event into the equations.
I think that some of us at least had an inkling of what was likely to happen back in 2007.:)
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=6759534&postcount=105
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=9202453&postcount=168There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...0 -
worldtraveller wrote: »I think that some of us at least had an inkling of what was likely to happen back in 2007.:)
The Finance Director of NR at the time of floatation in 1997. Resigned from the Company on the grounds of its business strategy. Reporting his concerns to the Treasury. (I believe this was around 2003 or 2004). However no action was taken.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The Finance Director of NR at the time of floatation in 1997. Resigned from the Company on the grounds of its business strategy. Reporting his concerns to the Treasury. (I believe this was around 2003 or 2004). However no action was taken.
None of us, and none of them, seriously considered the possibility that the banks would - a) give all their money away, and - b) reclaim their losses from us all without any requirement to repay
So, in a way, it is hard to criticise conventionally-trained economists
But, at the same time, it is pointless to ask conventionally-trained economists to try to find a way forward - it might even be worth asking the bankers for their suggestions, since they have already proved themselves to be able to push boundaries beyond all known limits...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
But, at the same time, it is pointless to ask conventionally-trained economists to try to find a way forward - it might even be worth asking the bankers for their suggestions, since they have already proved themselves to be able to push boundaries beyond all known limits...
Sound financial management doesn't require one to be an economist. There's always degrees of uncertainty and risk. The boundaries just went to far. The imposition of the new Basel banking regulations have yet to be fully felt. As these won't be fully implemented to 2018.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The imposition of the new Basel banking regulations have yet to be fully felt. As these won't be fully implemented to 2018.
Zzzzzzz...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
-
I wouldn't even rate it for dinner parties

Michael, MA Econ, CantabI think....0 -
Economics is definately not a science. Does anyone claim it is? If so they're stupid.
Economics is an interesting subject for the simple reason that it is to a large degree sentiment which makes it unpredictable. Anyone who studies it for any other reason than entertainment is sadly deluded.0 -
[quote=[Deleted User];46674327]Economics is definately not a science. Does anyone claim it is? If so they're stupid...[/QUOTE]
Go on then, define 'science', and explain in a sentence why [say] the following are/aren't sciences:
Chemistry.
Maths.
Economics.
History.FACT.0 -
I was a biologist- what do i know lol.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

