We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

cycle scheme - con trick? advice needed please.

Options
13

Comments

  • Keith
    Keith Posts: 2,924 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Custardly - I think the RM scheme has the different disposal charge because it is 18 months instead of 12.
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Keith wrote: »
    Custardly - I think the RM scheme has the different disposal charge because it is 18 months instead of 12.

    maybe but its quite a difference
    I was looking on the HMRC link and on a £500 bike it doesnt really work out to any of their percentages
  • jimmo
    jimmo Posts: 2,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sorry to harp on about the same point, but if, under the RM scheme, employees pay the "collection and disposal charge" of £35 at the end of the period of hire and get to keep the bike then RM is breaking the law.
    That would, most definitely, not be the first time that a major employer has fallen foul of Tax Law and, if RM employees are getting a pretty good deal from their employer's (tax) incompetence then good for them.
    Strictly speaking, if the reality is that RM are selling the bikes to employees for £35 the employee is liable to tax on the benefit of the difference between the £35 paid and the value of the bike from the HMRC valuation table.
    In my experience the reality is that when an HMRC audit uncovers the wrongdoing the employer "voluntarily" stumps up the employee's liability (plus a bit) because it is cheaper for the employer to pay up a global figure than go through their records, produce accurate Returns for a number of years and then face up to a disgruntled workforce who will suddenly face an unexpected tax liability through their employer's incompetence.
    On the basis of what you say I would suspect RM of getting it all wrong but if HMRC ever catch up with them they will pay up and change the rules of their scheme to comply with current tax law. Those who effectively escape their personal tax liability through their employer's incompetence will be none the wiser but those that get caught up when the employer changes the rules to comply with tax law, will think their employer is suddenly ripping them off.
    However, that does not really help the OP. He needs to consider whether the deal on offer is good for him. If it is, fair enough. If it isn't he can walk away. End of.
    If RM employees are getting a good deal because their employer is breaking tax law he cannot use that to get a better deal for himself. All he can possibly achieve is to bring forward the time when HMRC catches up with RM.
  • John_Pierpoint
    John_Pierpoint Posts: 8,401 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 29 August 2011 at 3:32AM
    HMRC waking up to the concept of depreciating a bike, as though it was a car, is a relatively new change in tax law. I have my doubts that second hand bikes really do have the values in the table. Those companies large enough to bother with all this administration were allowing the employees (partner?) to keep the bike at a cheap rate; not as a tax free perk, but to avoid the prospect of the firm's car park being cluttered up with rejected bikes.

    Nice idea from the politicians killed off by the tax man?

    My son for one says he cannot be bothered with the scheme now and is keeping his old bike for the moment.

    [That is a shame, I could do with a replacement bike;)]
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    well thats the thing
    looking at the OPs breakdown it makes it a pointless exercise no pun)
    all it offers is a way to pay a bike up at near full retail
    you could save more buying in the annual sales
  • Another option is that your company gives you the bike at the end of the 12 month period. This would then show on your P11D as a payment of £250, which you would be taxed on, so in reality would cost you £50 (Depending on your tax rate)
  • aeb_2
    aeb_2 Posts: 556 Forumite
    Don't do this if you are near to retirement and are in a final salary scheme (not so many now I know)
    As it reduces the final salary the pension calculation is less

    aims for 2014 - grow more fruit and veg, declutter
  • nikki1520
    nikki1520 Posts: 510 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Just as an aside, have a guess at a reasonably large employer who doesn't allow their staff to use this scheme?

    HMRC - always keeping up with the trends!
  • Nosht
    Nosht Posts: 744 Forumite
    Can't be bothered to read all the posts but my £500+ bike cost me only 1/3 of its value.


    N.
    Never be afraid to take a profit. ;)
    Keep breathing. :eek:
    Just because I am surrounded by FOOLS does not make me wise. :j
  • custardy
    custardy Posts: 38,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Nosht wrote: »
    Can't be bothered to read all the posts but my £500+ bike cost me only 1/3 of its value.


    N.

    great attitude for forum use :beer:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.