We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UK House Prices Will Hit "All Time High" by 2015
Comments
-
I had to laugh at this one today....0
-
They do admit to it being below inflation at least0
-
1 Hyde Park Lane may boost the house price statistics in the local area.
The 6 million 1 bed flat seems a little excessive.
J_B.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »For a real "Oh dear" moment, you need to look at the 'predictions' of Moneyweek or Capital Economics.

Better by far than any of the housing bears.
Of course you reckon Ray Boulger, famed Bullish pundit who said in september 2007 "house prices are unlikely to fall", is a regular mystic meg.
So we will have to take your opinions with a pinch of salt.0 -
Does anyone know what sort of salary this Daily Mail so-called 'journalist' is on?
Becky Barrow is her name. Right-click her name and get all her so-called 'articles' for Daily Mail and although quite 'productive', all we get is regurgitated press releases from all and sundry. Is this 'journalism'? At least it doesn't involve hacking phones or paying the police for information, but surely one wants an ounce of 'creativity' before shelling out 55 pence for this organ?
It occurs to me that there are lots of people - including many on this forum [I'm sure geneer might agree] - who simply regurgitate any old drivel they can read already, and regurgitate it in the name of 'news'. The difference is that people here do it for free, while 'Becky' is presumably on quite a nice 'package'!
I can only come to two conclusions. Either 'Becky' should not be paid a penny for this drivel, or geneer should receive £80K basic, plus expenses, plus generous pension for his voluminous posts.
Shall I start the 'geneer subscriptions' so we can pay him, or are there other volunteers?0 -
@Loughton Monkey
The way to cash in to to have an economic think tank. With this you can get the press to subscribe to reports. They obviously pay more for quoting huge chunks hence it would be wise to incorporate startling headlines.
No two think tanks are allowed to agree hence it pays to contradict everyone else and be controversial.
The result is a different headline everyday to serve up to the readership, filling the space between the adverts.
J_B.0 -
Joe_Bloggs wrote: »@Loughton Monkey
The way to cash in to to have an economic think tank.....
.. but read my post again. I was talking about geneer. Is there such a thing as an 'economic can't think tank'?Joe_Bloggs wrote: »No two think tanks are allowed to agree hence it pays to contradict everyone else and be controversial.
Here, I violently disagree with you, and every single poster on this thread except myself. And I also know that the world is flat.Joe_Bloggs wrote: »The result is a different headline everyday to serve up to the readership, filling the space between the adverts.
.... the irony being that most often, the adverts are more truthful, are more informative than the articles, and cost a lot more to produce.0 -
With net immigration increasing and house building falling, well you do the mathsHi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
-
Epic timing. Rome is burning and they put out this.
Rome burning would reduce housing stock available which would lead to price rises
House prices can very easily reach new highs but if you examine it as a ratio to cost of renting or average wages it might be they fall to new lows
Better to look at ratios I think, in terms of cost of available finance house prices are extremely cheap ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
