We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

mistreated by agency - not being paid, unfair dismissal etc

2»

Comments

  • Jarndyce
    Jarndyce Posts: 1,281 Forumite
    Hammyman wrote: »
    Suing is a civil matter. A tribuneral carries severe consequences.

    What do you base this statement on exactly?

    The consequences of a tribunal are no more severe than a civil court - indeed as the amount of compensation available in a civil court is unlimited, I would say the opposite is true.
  • KiKi
    KiKi Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    edited 9 August 2011 at 4:15PM
    V_Debt wrote: »
    I got 2 payslips, 1 for the 2 days and one for the 2 days and the 5 days for the following week. The first payslip for the 2 days had tax and ni come off it. Then the next one, the 2 days and the 5 days were taxed and nied. They then took the net amount they paid me from the first week for the 2 days off the net for the 5 and 2 days together.

    Then that's correct. For ease of calculation, let's assume you earn £50 a day, with figures rounded.


    If they'd done it separately:

    Payslip 1
    2 days: £100
    After tax (20%) and NI (12%): £68

    Payslip 2
    5 days: £250
    After tax and NI: £170

    TOTAL for both payslips SHOULD be: £238


    What they did:

    Payslip 1
    2 days: £100
    After tax (20%) and NI (12%): £68

    Payslip 2
    2 + 5 days: £350
    After tax and NI: £238
    MINUS the first payslip: £170 (£238 net minus £68 net)

    TOTAL for both payslips IS: £238


    This isn't about getting numbers correcting, but pointing out that the principle of what they've done is correct. You may owe them an apology...

    KiKi
    ' <-- See that? It's called an apostrophe. It does not mean "hey, look out, here comes an S".
  • V_Debt
    V_Debt Posts: 72 Forumite
    Im not self employed or under an umbrella company. They tried to push going onto an umbrella onto me.

    Kiki - its not that simple.

    I havent got the payslips infront of me but roughly it went like this..

    payslip 1: gross for 2 days £190
    tax and ni: around £9 tax and 6 ni
    net: £174

    payslip 2: £580 for 2 days and 5 days together
    tax and ni: £87 tax and £52 ni
    net: £440 minus the £174 from previous week = £266 for a 60 hour week??

    are you saying this is right?

    to put it briefly this is how I think it should have went..

    first week same as above..£190, £174 net
    second week £406, £321 net

    means that i was underpaid by around £55, all because they tried to put me onto an umbrella company slyly without my permission!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.