We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Administration of and Insolvent Estate
charabanc
Posts: 14 Forumite
I am sorry to post here, but I cannot find a more suitable place to post (unless someone can point me in the right direction?).
Earlier this year my brother passed away, it was quite without warning as he was only 54.
However it has fallen to me, his sister to try and sort out the financial mess. I am his next of kin as he had no partner or children.
He had debts of nearly £30,000 and after expences, only about £7,000 in the bank.
I took advice form my union solicitor, and even had advice form a local solicitor, who both said that none of his debts were any more important than any other, and that included the council.
So I set about working out exactly how much each of them were entitled to, and sent out the cheques. Everyone has since cashed their cheques except the local council, who insist they should have been paid all their money first, and not just a share of it. I have contacted my solicitor again, at my cost, who is still of the opinion that they, and I, are correct and that the council are wrong.
Can anyone shed any light on who is right and who is wrong?
Many thanks.
Earlier this year my brother passed away, it was quite without warning as he was only 54.
However it has fallen to me, his sister to try and sort out the financial mess. I am his next of kin as he had no partner or children.
He had debts of nearly £30,000 and after expences, only about £7,000 in the bank.
I took advice form my union solicitor, and even had advice form a local solicitor, who both said that none of his debts were any more important than any other, and that included the council.
So I set about working out exactly how much each of them were entitled to, and sent out the cheques. Everyone has since cashed their cheques except the local council, who insist they should have been paid all their money first, and not just a share of it. I have contacted my solicitor again, at my cost, who is still of the opinion that they, and I, are correct and that the council are wrong.
Can anyone shed any light on who is right and who is wrong?
Many thanks.
0
Comments
-
What sort of debt did he owe to the council? council tax? rent arrears?
what sort of debts were the other debts? unsecured loans/cards etc? utility debts?A smile enriches those who receive without making poorer those who giveor "It costs nowt to be nice"0 -
This link here http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/ManagingDebt/DebtsAndArrears/DG_10013093 shows the order debts should be paid off.
Rent arrears and council tax arrears and utility bills should be paid off before any money is paid to consumer credit debts.A smile enriches those who receive without making poorer those who giveor "It costs nowt to be nice"0 -
Hi Tixy, I have been to that link many times, it does say there is an order, but I cannot find what that order actually is?
Thanks.0 -
Its on that link.
First mortgage
Then rent
Then water
Then council tax
Then gas & elec
Then consumer credit debtA smile enriches those who receive without making poorer those who giveor "It costs nowt to be nice"0 -
I'm not convinced by the order on that link - it does list debts in a particular order, but I don't think that it explicitly says that debts should be paid in that order.
This website does give an order - but it doesn't give any references as to where the order came from, so I can't check that it's correct. On the face of it the order looks plausible - I know that reasonable funeral expenses do come first - but it conflicts with what the OP's solicitor has told him. It suggests that debts to "local and central government" come before unsecured creditors, but the OP's solicitor has said something different. I'd be inclined to believe a solicitor who knows about the specific circumstances over something random on the internet.0 -
I have today, after nearly 4 months of worry, recieved this email from the council in question,
"Dear Madam, I went to our clerk and solicitors and they confirmed that rent is not listed as a preferential debt. I have passed the pro rata cheque to our cash office and will pass the remainder of the arrear for a write off.
Please accept my apologies for the inconvenience we may have caused you. "
So it would appear the council were wrong, who would have thought that????
Just to be sure, if anyone finds themselves in this situation in the future, the council are not entitled to any arrears, or other charges for that matter, before anyone else. They all get equal percentages of the estate.0 -
Complain to the council and ask them to reimburse your solicitor charges. Take it to the local government ombudsman if necessary. You have acted in good faith, you have paid them what they are due and you should not be out of pocket over this.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
Why are you worrying about this? I know he was your brother but you are not responsible for any of these problems. You could walk away from them all and nobody could do anything about it.
If he appointed you as Executor, all you have to do is resign!
My late mother's brother did this to her - appointed her as executor in his will against her wishes (she was 84 at the time). I spoke to my solicitor and he advised that she should resign and leave everything to the authorities, which is what she did."There are not enough superlatives in the English language to describe a 'Princess Coronation' locomotive in full cry. We shall never see their like again". O S Nock0 -
Op, why did you not section-off £1k to cover your expenses?. As for the council, well, just like the other creditors, they cannot have what isn't there.Never Knowingly Understood.
Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)
3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards