We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Long Term Sick Legal Question

24

Comments

  • LadyMissA
    LadyMissA Posts: 3,263 Forumite
    Uncertain wrote: »
    No it is not "generosity" if it is part of your employment package any more than your holiday or wages are "generosity"! It is the whole package the encourages somebody to apply for a particular job - or not.

    I'm aware that many jobs offer far less. However, if that is what was included in the deal then the OP is entitled to be paid.

    some offer nothing
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    LadyMissA wrote: »
    some offer nothing

    Indeed.

    But then some people have the intelligence or education to be able to get jobs that offer more......
  • LadyMissA
    LadyMissA Posts: 3,263 Forumite
    Uncertain wrote: »
    Indeed.

    But then some people have the intelligence or education to be able to get jobs that offer more......
    Haha not funny
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    They have to give you 28days that leaves 11 extra contractual days.

    What they are saying is you lose all those 11 days due to not working a 1/3 of the year

    That don't look right thye can't prorata the statutory holidays.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    [QUOTE=Uncertain;45491574]No it is not "generosity" if it is part of your employment package any more than your holiday or wages are "generosity"! It is the whole package the encourages somebody to apply for a particular job - or not.

    I'm aware that many jobs offer far less. However, if that is what was included in the deal then the OP is entitled to be paid.[/QUOTE]
    It is generosity using other peoples (taxpayers) money.
  • Donstar
    Donstar Posts: 123 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    It is generosity using other peoples (taxpayers) money.

    Actually I've worked for them for 14 years with just the odd sick day in all that time. I was actually off with PTSD received while serving my country, so think twice before accusing someone of sponging off the tax payer!
    Mortgage - Free :j
    Lloyds CC - £0 Paid Off
    Santander CC - £0 Paid Off
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    ILW wrote: »
    It is generosity using other peoples (taxpayers) money.

    Nonsense!

    By that argument, so is her salary!
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    That don't look right thye can't prorata the statutory holidays.

    But they can have a clause saying that you lose some or all of the EXTRA holiday if you take more than a certain amount of sick leave.
  • Donstar
    Donstar Posts: 123 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Uncertain wrote: »
    But they can have a clause saying that you lose some or all of the EXTRA holiday if you take more than a certain amount of sick leave.

    But that clause is not on my 'Contract of Employment' where my leave entitlement and sickness absense are mentioned.
    Mortgage - Free :j
    Lloyds CC - £0 Paid Off
    Santander CC - £0 Paid Off
  • Uncertain
    Uncertain Posts: 3,901 Forumite
    Donstar wrote: »
    But that clause is not on my 'Contract of Employment' where my leave entitlement and sickness absense are mentioned.

    I didn't say it was and obviously I've not seen your contract, employee handbook etc.

    I was merely trying to make clear that there could be all kinds of terms and conditions attached to holiday over and above the statutory minimum.

    All you can do is carefully study the terms and check that they have applied them correctly. Obviously no term can reduce your basic legal entitlement, otherwise it would be unenforceable, but as far as I can see that hasn't happened.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.