We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rents hit record high
Comments
-
Loughton_Monkey wrote: »Come back Peter Rachman. You are a demi-God. All is forgiven......
Give it a few years.....
When a decade of under building crashes into the biggest generation of 30-somethings in history, bigger even than the boomers. When the housing shortage is so severe rents take up 70%+ of the average salary, and still there's fights breaking out just to get a spot on the multi-year waiting list for even an interview with the letting agent. When population has grown by 10 million, and we've built less than 20% of the houses required.
Rachman will seem like Mother Theresa.
And even the bears will rue the day they ever thought a housing shortage could be solved by a mortgage famine and falling prices.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Give it a few years.....
When a decade of under building crashes into the biggest generation of 30-somethings in history, bigger even than the boomers. When the housing shortage is so severe rents take up 70%+ of the average salary, and still there's fights breaking out just to get a spot on the multi-year waiting list for even an interview with the letting agent. When population has grown by 10 million, and we've built less than 20% of the houses required.
Rachman will seem like Mother Theresa.
And Hamish will be happy (and probably many others).
Sad (greedy) B'ds.30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.0 -
-
-
And Hamish will be happy (and probably many others).
Hamish will continue to derive a great degree of satisfaction from being proven right...... Yet again.
I've got thousands of posts warning all of you crashaholics exactly what would happen as a result of mortgage rationing. And now it has.
But as for housing.... like most sane people, I'd much rather we got back to prudent, historically normal, lending standards so that builders can start building more houses again and FTB-s can get a house rather than being forced to enrich their landlords.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Round this neck of the woods (Thames Valley green belt) there were very few lets available until about 2009 now there seem to be loads and whole agent shopfronts advertising them. And anecdotally I can say that a relative got a great deal renting due to landlord's nervousness about getting decent reliable tenants.
So the aforesaid news looks to be London London London Yada Yada Yada
Again0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Hamish will continue to derive a great degree of satisfaction from being proven right...... Yet again.
I've got thousands of posts warning all of you crashaholics exactly what would happen as a result of mortgage rationing. And now it has.
But as for housing.... like most sane people, I'd much rather we got back to prudent, historically normal, lending standards so that builders can start building more houses again and FTB-s can get a house rather than being forced to enrich their landlords.
Yes. You do appear to have thousands of post on the subject.
Warning of the unimaginable effects of banks lending less with stricter criteria.
I'm sure absolutely no one but you could guess the outcome of that.
I mean only a genius could have predicted renting increasing as the number of FTBs fell.
No doubt why you've been compelled to post it again and again and again. Yawn.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Rents rise.
Interest rates rise.
Reluctant landlords sell.
Tenants buy.
May take time but there's where we are heading.
Or alternatively......
Rents Rise.
Increasing yields draw in investment capital which chases the current scarce housing stock.
House prices inevitably rise as a result.
The "wealth effect" kicks in and consumer confidence returns.
The economic recovery picks up as a result.
Strengthening economy and prices attract funding to the lending markets, still operating at record high margins.
An increase in funding enables the end of mortgage rationing and competition between lenders.
Rising asset prices, rising GDP, rising employment, shrinking lending margins, all meet the BOE's stated criteria for raising base rates, which they then do, slowly and surely so as not to derail the virtuous circle of recovery.
And the 20 year cycle starts all over again......;)“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Hamish will continue to derive a great degree of satisfaction from being proven right...... Yet again.
I've got thousands of posts warning all of you crashaholics exactly what would happen as a result of mortgage rationing. And now it has.
But as for housing.... like most sane people, I'd much rather we got back to prudent, historically normal, lending standards so that builders can start building more houses again and FTB-s can get a house rather than being forced to enrich their landlords.
I know I a a more extreme version of Hamish but one thing the crashers will never be able to deny is that we are usually spot on with our predictions.
When I joined HPC I said from the start the government would never allow house prices to drop.
I got loads of stick but here we are in 2011 with no crash in sight.
I would love to hear from some of the people who were quoting 70% falls and telling everyone how they would be living in a 4 bed detatched by Xmas 2009.We love Sarah O Grady0 -
Yes. You do appear to have thousands of post on the subject.
Warning of the unimaginable effects of banks lending less with stricter criteria.
I'm sure absolutely no one but you could guess the outcome of that.
I mean only a genius could have predicted renting increasing as the number of FTBs fell.
No doubt why you've been compelled to post it again and again and again. Yawn.
:rotfl:No comment from Hamishgettingouttahere McTavish.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards