We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
SIPP - Question re protected rights

mystic_trev
Posts: 5,434 Forumite


I moved my from my ex company scheme into a SIPP several years ago. However, at that time I couldn't move the Protected rights, amount as SIPP providers wouldn't allow it. Does anyone know if this has changed? I will ask the Provider in the New Year, but am interested if anyone has additional information?
How sad am I posting this on Christmas day!
How sad am I posting this on Christmas day!
0
Comments
-
Yes, you can hold protected rights funds in a SIPP.0
-
Err not yet you can't.
You might be able to after April.
Stay tunedTrying to keep it simple...0 -
You're right. Thanks for the correction!0
-
hybrid SIPPs and fund supermarket personal pensions can hold protected rights but full SIPPs cannot.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
-
dunstonh wrote:hybrid SIPPs and fund supermarket personal pensions can hold protected rights
This is because they are not Sipps, regradless of what they may like to call themselves for marketing purposes. :rolleyes:Trying to keep it simple...0 -
This is because they are not Sipps, regradless of what they may like to call themselves for marketing purposes. :rolleyes:
And most people who buy SIPPs do not use the features that make SIPPS unique but stick with the investment options that are used on fund supermarket and hybrid SIPPs.
The name isnt important. Its what people do with it that is.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
And most people who buy SIPPs do not use the features that make SIPPS unique but stick with the investment options that are used on fund supermarket and hybrid SIPPs.
The name isnt important. Its what people do with it that is.
I think this might be the second time I remember agreeing with Ed! Hybrid SIPPs aren't real sipps as you can't invest directly in equities. They have been designed by the life companies to try and stem some of the anticipated outflows when protected rights may be allowed to be transferred out.
People may be using real sipps for fund purchases but I see this as simply moving from the frying pan to the fire - a fund manager still has to be paid and they fail to grab the major advantage of sipps i.e. lower costs.
The government have made a few u turns on pensions recently and I wouldn't be surprised if they caved in to industry pressure and change their plans to allow protected rights in sipps.0 -
I think this might be the second time I remember agreeing with Ed! Hybrid SIPPs aren't real sipps as you can't invest directly in equities.
No-one is saying a hybrid SIPP is a full SIPP. If it was a full SIPP it wouldnt be called a hybrid SIPP.They have been designed by the life companies to try and stem some of the anticipated outflows when protected rights may be allowed to be transferred out.
No they havent. The hybrid SIPPs are offered by the fund supermarkets and they have no legacy pension business.People may be using real sipps for fund purchases but I see this as simply moving from the frying pan to the fire - a fund manager still has to be paid and they fail to grab the major advantage of sipps i.e. lower costs.
That comes down to investment choice. Some people like shares. Some like unit trusts. Some like ITs. Some like a combination. Most SIPPs end up investing in unit trusts.
The government have made a few u turns on pensions recently and I wouldn't be surprised if they caved in to industry pressure and change their plans to allow protected rights in sipps.
The logic why it wasnt included was sound and the increased solvency and regulatory requirements SIPPs will be working under means that they should be suitable for protected rights. Therefore removing one of the reasons why protected rights were not allowed before. It's a sensible move and not one that has required any "politcal" or agenda driven pressure.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards