We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

will halifax overturn a btl mortgage application?

hi.

our house move has stalled for the moment because there seems to be a discrepency with the investor buying our property.
basically he had his mortgage application turned down (but he did have a AIP) because he needs to have owned his property (that he bought for cash & is renting out) for six months to do a btl mortgage. He has only owned the property since April. He is currently trying to get the decision overturned.

How strict are the halifax with 6 months ownership of the property?
Are there any exceptions?
Is there anyway around this?

If he gets refused, we lose our sale & we'll probably lose the house we had an offer acepted on.

someone please give me some hope.
«1

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The Halifax sets the rules. I doubt for a second they'll change them for one potential customer.

    Your investor should have made enquiries at the outset.
  • FraudBuster
    FraudBuster Posts: 931 Forumite
    I'll admit, somethings not right - this issue with the (6 month) buy to let mortgage is ridiculous, his financial advisor, his solicitor, his EA & himself didn't know about it!!! !!!!!!??

    Help!!!

    Professional property investors and their advisers know about the six month rule.
  • bumgum
    bumgum Posts: 31 Forumite
    edited 7 July 2011 at 9:20PM
    the thing that I really don't understand is how has it got this far? he has an agreement in principle.
  • bumgum
    bumgum Posts: 31 Forumite
    edited 7 July 2011 at 9:36PM
    that he bought for cash = red flags.

    maybe i'm being naive, but I don't understand.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    bumgum wrote: »
    the thing that I really don't understand is how has it got this far? he has an agreement in principle.

    An AIP does not constitute an offer. As a full mortgage application has not been made.

    Why does the investor need to remortgage his other property? Presumably as he doesn't have sufficent funds or borrowing power to purchase your property.

    The AIP would have been based on his income not assets.
  • bumgum
    bumgum Posts: 31 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    An AIP does not constitute an offer. As a full mortgage application has not been made.

    Why does the investor need to remortgage his other property? Presumably as he doesn't have sufficent funds or borrowing power to purchase your property.

    The AIP would have been based on his income not assets.


    there is no other way he can finance our property.
  • FraudBuster
    FraudBuster Posts: 931 Forumite
    Check out Thrugs replies to a previous thread:

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3338132
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,340 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 7 July 2011 at 9:48PM
    Error clarified by OP.

    Investor is remortgaging property one to buy property two.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • bumgum
    bumgum Posts: 31 Forumite
    Research Money Laundering.

    he is part financing our house with his btl.
    so he will be taking money out of the house, not putting money in it.
    if i've got that right.
  • bumgum
    bumgum Posts: 31 Forumite
    kingstreet wrote: »
    Error clarified by OP.

    Investor is remortgaging property one to buy property two.

    that is correct.
    is there any chance this can be resolved kingstreet?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.