We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Savers urge rate rise

135

Comments

  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I bet the tune you are singing today will be vastly different when you are in your pension years.

    F'k em though. They had their chance. It's all about us now.

    Really did I say that??? can I borrow your flounce around "where did I say that, you are putting words in my mouth" button?

    I would worry more about the pensioners without savings TBH graham.

    Good emotive argument though and little to do why you think rates should go up.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker

    So if you were saving for a house/anything - and then lost your job - you're penalised on a fictitious rate that you're not getting. e.g. savings income = £50, but they say it's £5000. (I am not entirely clear how they do it, or the rates and I have no links)

    If you have a mortgage and savings it is the same?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Apologise to your moth for me, terribly sorry.

    And yes, you may aswell have said that. You said they either save (actually you said hoarde), and shutup, or invest.

    Not really great advise to a pensioner using savings as a pension is it.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 7 July 2011 at 1:47PM
    Apologise to your moth for me, terribly sorry.

    And yes, you may aswell have said that. You said they either save (actually you said hoarde), and shutup, or invest.

    Not really great advise to a pensioner using savings as a pension is it.

    ??????

    Well I save at 0.99% graham because I do not want to risk my money?

    So am I saying F'myself.

    Stop making stuff up to cause an argument, it was clear interest rates before the bust based on the fact banks were gambling.

    Saving has always meant putting money away, not making money?

    People like you seem to compleatly ignore the pre-bust savings rates were unsustinable and were based on the money from the credit boom.
  • MacMickster
    MacMickster Posts: 3,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    abaxas wrote: »
    Isnt the issue not that we need savers or borrowers, but we need the two in balance.

    If the savers dont get a return, they dont save, so you cant lend.
    If the borrowers cant borrow, the savers cant get a return.

    It's a purely symbiotic relationship.

    This is, unfortunately, a myth.

    Banks create (but not print) money when they make a loan.

    EG Saver deposits £1000 - Borrower takes loan of £1000, but leaves it sitting in his account initially. Both Saver and Borrower each have £1000 in their accounts - total £2000 - so where has the money loaned by the bank come from? It is new, created money, which will cease to exist when the loan is repaid.

    The bank, however, need not stop at lending just £1000. It can loan many times the money deposited. Deposits are typically only around 10% of the amount loaned to borrowers.

    The credit crunch was partly due to banks over extending themselves and not retaining sufficient capital. When loans began to go bad their balance sheets could not stand the losses.
    "When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I have savings, 4.4% - 6.2% Fixed ISA's with the Halifax and 6.2% with NS&I (over the past 12 months not sure about the next), all these are tax free :beer:, what's the problem ?
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ess0two wrote: »
    Surely you've benefitted,you bailed out at the top of the market.

    There were some amazing fixed savings rates around in 2008/9, 6/7/8% if you could trust the banks :eek: although I am sure you could have stayed under the guarantees.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    StevieJ wrote: »
    I have savings, 4.4% - 6.2% Fixed ISA's with the Halifax and 6.2% with NS&I (over the past 12 months not sure about the next), all these are tax free :beer:, what's the problem ?

    The problem is that you can't put as much as you want to into those accounts there are limits.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The problem is that you can't put as much as you want to into those accounts there are limits.

    I have as much as I want in them, the savings certs have been at least two a year in recent memory so additions of £30k a year wasn't bad, in fact.
    If you had invested the maximum amount in NS&I certificates over the past decade, and rolled them into inflation linked certificates when they matured, and invested on behalf of a spouse as well, you could quite easily be sheltering more than £1m from taxes, with a risk-free return of nearly 10% for highest-rate taxpayers.

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/saving/article-1723973/NSI-inflation-bonds-a-subsidy-for-the-rich.html
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • johnny_storm
    johnny_storm Posts: 259 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »
    It's not a human right that savers should get a risk free return above inflation.

    Nor is it a human right that a bank should lend to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.