We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

House query after marriage split?

Hi all, not sure if this is the right place to ask.

I am splitting from my wife and moving into a rented apartment in 3 weeks time. We have been together 20 years, married for 11 of those years and in a mortgage for 14 years. We also have two kids under 10.

It’s all amicable and we are not planning on a divorce yet, it’s something we might do down the line if needed but we need to do something about the house, she will carry on living there and my name is on the mortgage/endowment but at some point in the future once the kids are grown up and left home, presumably I need to get something out of it financially, I have been the major wage earner since we met too.

How does this work? What should I be entitled too? A friend suggested to her that if we sold now, I would get 20%, is that a fair amount? If we sold now, there is about 70k equity. If 20% is considered fair, do we put this in writing and lodge it somewhere, think she is scared that I will change my mind in later years and want more, can’t see it happening but you never know I suppose.

Can anyone help?

Comments

  • TrickyDicky101
    TrickyDicky101 Posts: 3,535 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Once the kids are out of the equation I would think (without considering other assets of the marriage such as any pension fund you might have) that the division of assets would be on the basis of 50:50. Since presumably the kids are staying in the marital home and need looking after, any division now would presumably take this into account and thus might reduce your share.

    If you have no intention of forcing a sale at the current time but will be supporting your wife/children, why would you not want a 50% share after they have left home?

    By the way I am not a lawyer and have no legal training, so my opinions above are just my own thoughts and shouldn't be relied upon.
  • spendleb
    spendleb Posts: 37 Forumite
    Cheers, not sure really, suppose I am trying to keep her happy but I know she feels from now until the mortgage is paid up (could be 27 years (we had a 2 year break to research building our own place, market went **** so had to start again with a full term), I will not be paying towards it so why should I benefit from now onwards with a 50% share?
  • beecher2
    beecher2 Posts: 3,677 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    How's your wife going to pay the mortgaeg? Didn't you say in another thread that she was low paid and having to rely on benefits?
  • spendleb
    spendleb Posts: 37 Forumite
    beecher2 wrote: »
    How's your wife going to pay the mortgaeg? Didn't you say in another thread that she was low paid and having to rely on benefits?

    Yeah, if she can get the benefits the online checker suggests she can (she is really finding it difficult to apply for these, stigma of being on benefits) plus my money and her wage, she would be fine. She is training to be teaching assistant then a teacher so it's not forever, hopefully she can increase her wage at some point.
  • ViolaLass
    ViolaLass Posts: 5,764 Forumite
    If you're giving her money, won't you effectively be paying part of the mortgage?
  • spendleb
    spendleb Posts: 37 Forumite
    ViolaLass wrote: »
    If you're giving her money, won't you effectively be paying part of the mortgage?

    Not in her eyes, that's purely child maintenance money.
  • ViolaLass
    ViolaLass Posts: 5,764 Forumite
    But part of child maintenance means keeping a home for them i.e. paying the mortgage.
  • CAN1976
    CAN1976 Posts: 263 Forumite
    spendleb wrote: »
    Cheers, not sure really, suppose I am trying to keep her happy but I know she feels from now until the mortgage is paid up (could be 27 years (we had a 2 year break to research building our own place, market went **** so had to start again with a full term), I will not be paying towards it so why should I benefit from now onwards with a 50% share?


    Well yeah, if you are not paying towards the mortage i future, you should only have a claim on current equity?

    If the house was owned outright would CS payments be any less?
  • spendleb
    spendleb Posts: 37 Forumite
    ViolaLass wrote: »
    But part of child maintenance means keeping a home for them i.e. paying the mortgage.

    yeah I know, she just doesn't see that though, child maintenance and the mortgage are two separate things to her, doesnt help that her mum believes that I am paying both, god knows how she thinks I can do that!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.