We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

What happens when the bank shares are sold?

I don't know much about economics etc, but....

The government has bought lots of shares in the failing banks to stop them from crashing. The public are having to tighten their belts to pay for this share buying. But what happens when the government sells the shares - where will this money go?
«1

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    To repay the national debt.
  • Loughton_Monkey
    Loughton_Monkey Posts: 8,913 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker Hung up my suit!
    No-one has had to tighten their belts. This money came from the 'capital' account (not revenue) and should, eventually, get re-paid in full, with interest, back into the county's 'capital'.

    We have to tighten our belts because Brother Brown spent like crazy - mainly on benefits and unnecessary public sector workers - using money we didn't have. He is so brainless he 'missed the point' about so-called 'Keynsian' economics. When we get to a recession, we are supposed to spend money on public works, roads, schools, bridges, infrastructure.....

    Not benefits!
  • No-one has had to tighten their belts. This money came from the 'capital' account (not revenue) and should, eventually, get re-paid in full, with interest, back into the county's 'capital'.

    We have to tighten our belts because Brother Brown spent like crazy - mainly on benefits and unnecessary public sector workers - using money we didn't have. He is so brainless he 'missed the point' about so-called 'Keynsian' economics. When we get to a recession, we are supposed to spend money on public works, roads, schools, bridges, infrastructure.....

    Not benefits!

    couldn't have said it better myself, bravo!
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    This money came from the 'capital' account (not revenue)

    The money was borrowed. NR was funded with around £29 billion to see it through its liquidity problems initially. Likewise a smaller amount at B&B.

    As the mortgage books are redeemed then the banks are repaying the Treasury as free cash flow allows.
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 10 June 2011 at 10:00PM
    If we are anything like many other countries, we have no money when you discount the debt from the assets
    That only works because they sell future tax revenue and keep estimating it'll rise

    Lloyds is not repaying anything directly. It pays no dividends and the cashflows it has are managed according to their own decisions. A spanish guy runs them now, used to be an american.

    Actually they may have been lent money behind the scenes in which case they would repay that by refinancing the debt in private market place.

    I think they done a fair bit of that which is good because HBOS biggest problem was from 2008 onwards it needed to raise 200bn and Lehmans going broke kinda put people off. Lloyds used to have a AAA rating before buying HBOS
    HBOS bought 25 year mortgages with market money only given for a few years, same as BB and NR. Its possible they might still be here otherwise.
    I dont think they have taken great losses on housing, only a default does that, the fear is they might still

    Anyway this relates to the base value of these Shares government now owns. Debt ranks over shares so share value can be absolute zero.
    If government sells shares, the buyers would need to believe the whole company model is working
    Right now government cannot sell, nobody believes in Lloyds enough definitely not RBS


    The money spent on shares is not a gigantic amount, it would be reused on other investments like an aircraft carrier or whatever.
    If this share money never was returned you will likely pay more tax in future and/or they'd be no aircraft carrier which presumably harms the countrys defence/industry
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    B'stard wrote: »
    But what happens when the government sells the shares - where will this money go?
    The banks in question are able to function when they ought to be bankrupt only because their debts are in effect temporarily guaranteed by the government, so transferring the liability from the company balance sheet to the public sector.

    The shares can only become better than worthless if the government finds some sleight of hand to make that transfer permanent, so the money poured down the drain by HBOS and RBS is permanently absorbed into the national debt.

    The money raised from selling the shares will partially offset that. No doubt it will be presented differently.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Lloyds is not repaying anything directly. It pays no dividends and the cashflows it has are managed according to their own decisions. A spanish guy runs them now, used to be an american.

    Actually they may have been lent money behind the scenes in which case they would repay that by refinancing the debt in private market place.

    Lloyds was funded under the SLS and SGS by the Treasury.

    Under the SLS (Special Liquidity Scheme) Lloyds was lent around £185 billion. Last figures I recall seeing Lloyds had repaid £65 billion of the advance. The scheme expires January 2012. There will be no extension of the scheme. So Lloyds will either have to repay in full or fund from other sources. At the very least this could mean a rise in lending rates as the cost of funding will most certainly be higher.
  • Kohoutek
    Kohoutek Posts: 2,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    The money was borrowed.

    None of the funds from the "Special Liquidity Scheme" was borrowed in the sense of borrowing from external sources, it was simply created as treasury bills as you can see below. It was "borrowed" from one part of government (the DMO) by another part of government (the BoE).

    http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/Financial-crisis.pdf page 80
    Overview of the Scheme

    The scheme can be divided into three main stages. In the first, the government issues the treasury bills and then lends them to the Bank of England. In the second stage the central bank exchanges them with participating banks' assets, charging a fee for doing so. In the third stage the participating banks are now the legal owner of sufficient quality assets to use them as collateral to borrow against in the markets, the intention being to allow these markets to return to action.

    Although the issuance will be at market rates, the treasury bills are not issued directly to the market. The Debt Management Office loans them to the central bank in a stock-lending arrangement.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Kohoutek wrote: »
    None of the funds from the "Special Liquidity Scheme" was borrowed in the sense of borrowing from external sources, it was simply created as treasury bills as you can see below. It was "borrowed" from one part of government (the DMO) by another part of government (the BoE).

    My comment to borrowed refers to the rump of NR and B&B which now resides in NRAM.

    As retail customer deposits sit in the new Northern Rock.
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Under the SLS (Special Liquidity Scheme) Lloyds was lent around £185 billion. Last figures I recall seeing Lloyds had repaid £65

    Fair enough, I thought they had repaid and refinanced that already. Not great

    They need to get secure finance outside government asap
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.