We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Negative equity and wanting to sell

Hello all

I bought a house with my sister four years ago (at the height of the market). We got a mortgage with Northern Rock who offered us over 100% to cover the cost of the house, the deposit, the fees and some money to do it up!

The house is now worth about £150k (max £155k if we're really lucky) but the outstanding mortgage is still £158k.

We are both now in relationships and want to go our separate ways but don't want to be left paying the shortfall AND the fees on top!

Any advice?

Comments

  • opinions4u
    opinions4u Posts: 19,411 Forumite
    jeagle wrote: »
    We are both now in relationships and want to go our separate ways but don't want to be left paying the shortfall AND the fees on top!
    Who do you think should pay it for you instead?
    Any advice?
    Talk to Northern Rock and ask what schemes, if any, they have in place to allow you to repay the shortfall after sale. Ask the key question about how it will affect your credit ratings.
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    you are going to have to pay it I am afraid, otherwise you will need to sit it out and pay the mortgage until property values rise again....
  • holly_hobby
    holly_hobby Posts: 5,363 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 6 June 2011 at 10:30PM
    On the old NR 125% LTV mges (marketed at the time as a "Together Mortgage") - 95% of the LTR was classed as a mge & secured on the property, with anything up and above this figure in essence treated as a form of personal loan, albeit on the same rate as the mge itself.

    Now, upon redemption, if the total borrowing above the 95%, couldn't be cleared, the original NR solution was that the remainder up and over the orig mge amount was convered to SVR & a loading, and from therein treated as a standalone personal loan.

    Now I know since then, there has been a lot of changes to NR !! But, have a look at your mortgage t&cs - there may be something in there covering this. Failing this, have a chat with them ...

    The question is whether it would be transferred to a joint loan i.e reflective of the individuals party to the mge - or if you could elect to just have it in one name.

    Hope this helps

    Holly
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.