We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Adding wife to house deeds- how and why?
Options
Comments
-
now you need to ask the mortgage company because they will require the names on the deeds to be the same as the names on the mortgage
Clapton,
Just trying to clarify my own understanding here, because this is contrary to my understanding of how property charges (mortgages) work. But I am no expert.
I am not aware of a mechanism that would allow the mortgage company to stop the names of the proprietership being changed, to joint name or indeed any other name. I thought the lender was protected by the fact that their charge on the property cannot be removed other by their agreement (settlement of the loan), and will always allow them to reposses to recover any debts, irrespective of who the owner (proprieter) is.
When a mortgaged property is sold the buyer is told by the land registry about the charge on it, but it is for the buyer to satisfy himself that the lender will remove the charge at the point of completion of the sale, usually by the buyer paying off the lender as part of the sale process.
Apologies to Pumpkin for hijacking your threat - but I'm just keen to test my understanding.
CheersOptimists see a glass half full
Pessimists see a glass half empty
Engineers just see a glass twice the size it needed to be0 -
Clapton,
Just trying to clarify my own understanding here, because this is contrary to my understanding of how property charges (mortgages) work. But I am no expert.
I am not aware of a mechanism that would allow the mortgage company to stop the names of the proprietership being changed, to joint name or indeed any other name. I thought the lender was protected by the fact that their charge on the property cannot be removed other by their agreement (settlement of the loan), and will always allow them to reposses to recover any debts, irrespective of who the owner (proprieter) is.
When a mortgaged property is sold the buyer is told by the land registry about the charge on it, but it is for the buyer to satisfy himself that the lender will remove the charge at the point of completion of the sale, usually by the buyer paying off the lender as part of the sale process.
Apologies to Pumpkin for hijacking your threat - but I'm just keen to test my understanding.
CheersHi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
DVardysShadow wrote: »The terms of the charge for the mortgage at the Land Reg will probably prevent a change of proprietorship without first getting mortgagor's consent
Thanks Shadow, I didn't realise there was such a facility possible, that puts an onus on HMLR and presumably a liability if they do not do it.
Always learning...
pvtOptimists see a glass half full
Pessimists see a glass half empty
Engineers just see a glass twice the size it needed to be0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards