Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Cable tells banks to increase lending to small firms
WardwarkOwner
Posts: 1,766 Forumite
Comments
-
Whoops! ........It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0
-
why should the government want the banks to lend to small business?
it's up to the banks, not the government. Cable trying to get attention again tsk0 -
lemonjelly wrote: »Whoops! ........
lol, pretend its an inflation thread, can't have enough of those0 -
why should the government want the banks to lend to small business?
it's up to the banks, not the government.
Pssst! That's why I asked on my thread if the government were scapegoating the banks....;)It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
why should the government want the banks to lend to small business?
it's up to the banks, not the government.
Because one of the key reasons for bailing them out was to protect the economy from a lack of lending to businesses as they are collectively the major employers in the country.
General consensus among the business people I know is that they're actually calling in loans to businesses even when there are no defaults let alone creating new loans.0 -
WardwarkOwner wrote: »Because one of the key reasons for bailing them out was to protect the economy from a lack of lending to businesses as they are collectively the major employers in the country.
General consensus among the business people I know is that they're actually calling in loans to businesses even when there are no defaults let alone creating new loans.
it's the usual government propaganda deflecting the issue.0 -
i can understand you saying RBS and Lloyds but Santander, Barclays and HSBC weren't bailed out.
it's the usual government propaganda deflecting the issue.
Not directly bailed out however the problem was systemic and had the banks that were directly bailed out not been many of the others would have failed.0 -
Most of the businesses I know are not interested in increasing their borrowing at the moment. (Apart from the ones that are struggling and rather risky)0
-
WardwarkOwner wrote: »Not directly bailed out however the problem was systemic and had the banks that were directly bailed out not been many of the others would have failed.
Barclays took the Middle East funding route because they didn't want any government meddling like for example now.
Santander and HSBC balance sheets were in 'good order'.
Cable should !!!!!! and do a bit more for the small businesses for them instead of deflecting the issue from the government.0 -
why should the government want the banks to lend to small business?
it's up to the banks, not the government. Cable trying to get attention again tsk
maybe he is learning from ed balls.
http://www.labour.org.uk/response-to-bank-lending-figures,2011-05-230
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.2K Spending & Discounts
- 240.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.4K Life & Family
- 253.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards