We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Local Govt Scheme Pension too early!

2»

Comments

  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    On my final salary pension I could have opted for no lump sum and a bigger pension, but that would not have altered my widow's pension - it's based on the standard combo of pension/lump sum irrespective of my choice for myself. Do check your T&Cs.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • grnglide
    grnglide Posts: 171 Forumite
    The table used to do the calculation has different rates for married and single as well as male and female. I could get £6.32 per £100 if unmarried but only £5.63 per £100 if married so it "ought" to be included in the widows pension.

    Having spoken to them they say that it "increases the pension based on years service and salary on leaving and then calculate the Pensions Increase on that".

    Strangely he said that it is "extremely rare" to convert the lump sum to increase the pension as it would take "many years" to get the money back. Yes I could invest the lump sum, but at some point I will need income rather than savings.

    So now I have a choice of increased pension (possibly paid into AVCs with salary sacrifice), lump sump with smaller pension (possibly paid into AVCs (and scope for paying savings into it) or just take the standard money and do nothing!

    If I hadnt thought about it, it wouldnt be complicated!
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    "at some point I will need income rather than savings": so the thing to do is work out the most efficient way to get that income. It seems to me that a strong contender is your idea of taking max pension from the LGPS and effectively recycling it by salary sacrifice. The rules against "recycling" are aimed only at lump sums.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456K Spending & Discounts
  • 248K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.9K Life & Family
  • 263.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.