We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gifts to siblings
biscuitbrown
Posts: 1 Newbie
in Cutting tax
Is it still the case in the UK that you can give cash to a sibling without any tax implication?
0
Comments
-
There are no tax implications for the receiver in the UKmake the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
and we will never, ever return.0 -
biscuitbrown wrote: »Is it still the case in the UK that you can give cash to a sibling without any tax implication?
the is no tax implications when the gift is made for either party
however if the giver dies within 7 years then the gift may be subject to inheritance tax if the giver's estate is above the IHT allowance (currently 325k or 650k if the estate can take advance of the spouses IHT allowance)0 -
As Clapton says above, the 7 year rule applies for inheritance tax.0
-
Each person can gift up to one £3,000 in any tax year without any tax implications whatsoever. (only once in a tax year). Additionally gifts of up to £250 to any number of people, but not the same person. Above the £3000 limit, the IHT rule may apply under Potentially Exempt Tax rules.
SamI'm a retired IFA who specialised for many years in Inheritance Tax, Wills and Trusts. I cannot offer advice now, but my comments here and on Legal Beagles as Sam101 are just meant to be helpful. Do ask questions from the Members who are here to help.0 -
Not necessarily Senior Sam - don't forget regular gifts out of income which, in theory, can be unlimited.0
-
Ceeforcat is correct, this is also allowed.
However, gifts from income, not capital, need to be set up to be made on a regular basis, from income that does not reduce the givers normal standard of living. Ideally they should be set up on a Standing Order basis, but maintaining a 'paper trail', to satisfy the Revenue is essential as the Revenue are wise to those who try to circumvent this allowance and are likely to look into most cases.
SamI'm a retired IFA who specialised for many years in Inheritance Tax, Wills and Trusts. I cannot offer advice now, but my comments here and on Legal Beagles as Sam101 are just meant to be helpful. Do ask questions from the Members who are here to help.0 -
Ceeforcat is correct, this is also allowed.
However, gifts from income, not capital, need to be set up to be made on a regular basis, from income that does not reduce the givers normal standard of living. Ideally they should be set up on a Standing Order basis, but maintaining a 'paper trail', to satisfy the Revenue is essential as the Revenue are wise to those who try to circumvent this allowance and are likely to look into most cases.
Sam
how regular is regular? e.g once a year?
on what basis do you say 'ideally on a Standing Order'; I'm not aware of any regulation that mentions SOs0 -
I don't see how doing it by regular standing order helps in any way to demonstrate that the money is coming out of income. Someone might be regularly transfering considerable capital every year or month.
Surely to demonstrate that it is affordable out of income requires something like household accounts, demonstrating say an income of £30,000 pa, annual expenditure of £25,000 pa, therefore £5,000 pa affordable without reducing standard of living.
Commonsense says that laying down a paper trail is everything, but a standing order proves nothing. Look at the posts here from people who cycle money around between accounts in order to maximise Vantage interest.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Clapton,
there are no 'REGULATIONS' regarding S/O, but a bit of common sense suggests that in setting up an S/O, it would show 'intent for regular payments'.
Clifford Pope .... your middle paragraph is absolutely correct and something that would possibly be checked upon where these gifts are made. Some people think they can get round the rules by being crafty. If the payments are 'genuine', then they will be seen as such, but if regular capital sums are needed to support 'Normal Expenditure' when these gifts are being made, then it may not work. I am only trying to be helpful in suggesting ways that may help. As I'm sure we all are.
SamI'm a retired IFA who specialised for many years in Inheritance Tax, Wills and Trusts. I cannot offer advice now, but my comments here and on Legal Beagles as Sam101 are just meant to be helpful. Do ask questions from the Members who are here to help.0 -
You could set up a Poker Night in your front room ... and lose the lot to a sibling. That'd be tax free.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
