We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
SAGA says......
Comments
-
-
errr no.
as has been explained before on this thread and in many other threads interest rates are not the only fiscal tool available to try and deal with inflation.
Sorry, badly phrased, what I meant was is it accepted that there is nothing that can be done about the current way over target inflation? Or has it just been decided to let it run?0 -
poor graham. he thinks that raising interest rates will reduce cost push inflation and the VAT induced price rises.
i'd love him to explain how increasing base rates will reduce inflation.
It's my fault really - I shouldn't have given him the opportunity to flounce off by suggesting that converting pounds and pence into pints of milk didn't provide additional clarity.
Get ready for the new thread entitled something like "someone you've never heard of thinks interest rates should rise". There'll be a comment about not shooting the messenger. Unfortunately the messenger will have to be shot as there is a high probability that only selected parts of the message will be delivered.0 -
Kennyboy66 wrote: »The £216 is net income after housing costs.
Pensioners really have never had it so good.
For a few maybe. Fred the Shred for example is on a gross £6600 per week.
So there's a lot of people with an income less than £216 .0 -
Bloomin hell. The sun must be affecting us all. The end is nigh I tell ya!:eek:
You want proof. Earlier this month hamish thanked one of my posts.
Now I find I have to do the same!:eek:
Madness is the only way forward!It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
I think we should withdraw medical care for anyone over 80. Would sort out the high cost of housing pretty quickly.
Sod the saga generation.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »For a few maybe. Fred the Shred for example is on a gross £6600 per week.
So there's a lot of people with an income less than £216 .
Fred the shred gets 11000 pints of milk a week! :eek:This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »For a few maybe. Fred the Shred for example is on a gross £6600 per week.
So there's a lot of people with an income less than £216 .
Hmmm, one Fred the Shred / how many pensioners?
Hasn't there always been high pension recipients in the past the comparably still equates that pensioners appear to be finncially better off than in the past.
I'm amazed that people jump on the high earners / skewing effect debate so regularly.
It will have an affect I do not doubt, how much and was it much different to the decade before I'm not so sure.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »I'm amazed that people jump on the high earners / skewing effect debate so regularly.
It will have an affect I do not doubt, how much and was it much different to the decade before I'm not so sure.
Within Glasgow there's 2 distinct areas within 5 miles of each other. As a male your average life expectancy is around 35 years more if in you are in one area rather than the other.
That is the UK of today. A wide divergence depending on social and economic circumstances.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
