We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Got that defecit under control then...
lemonjelly
Posts: 8,014 Forumite
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13218582
So there's an extra £1.8bn there, plus we've enetered a pointless & unnecessary war (arguably with no real or valid reason?)
Combine this with the spin of the past few days that we're in "growth".:rotfl:
So there's an extra £1.8bn there, plus we've enetered a pointless & unnecessary war (arguably with no real or valid reason?)
Combine this with the spin of the past few days that we're in "growth".:rotfl:
It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
0
Comments
-
lemonjelly wrote: »http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13218582
So there's an extra £1.8bn there, plus we've enetered a pointless & unnecessary war (arguably with no real or valid reason?)
Combine this with the spin of the past few days that we're in "growth".:rotfl:
calm down dear.
the aircraft carriers are keynesian spending. the more they cost the better. well done to everyone involved.
i wish there was a rolling eyes smiley. please imagine there is one at the end of my post.0 -
Makes you wonder if some of the contracts dished out years ago have got more holes in them than a teabag.0
-
Libya = Oil security. Seems a good reason to me. Lots of BP infrastructure in there we dont want to lose? Perhaps...0
-
The OP would have more credibility to discuss economic matters if he could actually spell deficit.0
-
I thought this thread was about cures for diarrhoea.0
-
You really need to try and make a clear point in your original post. You sound very desperate.0
-
A pleonasm is a great big mistake of using consecutive adjectives that mean the same thing. Some may argue that is a small, minor error that helps delivers a clear, lucid message.
J_B.0 -
Joe_Bloggs wrote: »A pleonasm is a great big mistake of using consecutive adjectives that mean the same thing. Some may argue that is a small, minor error that helps delivers a clear, lucid message.
J_B.
A £100 fine for each utterance of 'tiny little' would wipe out the deficit in?0 -
1 billion and 710 million utterances. It could take a lengthy, protracted amount of time.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards