We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Oh Dear!
Comments
-
-
you best tell David Cameron and the rest of his monkeys - everytime he doesn't have an answer he harps on about the mess left to him by the previous government.
In the 80s and 90s it worked for the Tories. The Winter of Discontent in 78-79 and the IMF bailout of 1976 were strong folk memories of the incompetence of Labour Government. Whether that was entirely fair is immaterial really.
Messers Blair & Brown tried to do the same thing in turn referring to the previous Tory Governments. Tory cuts vs Labour investment. IMO Tory sleaze would have resonated more strongly with people but they won a lot of elections, basically on the premise that they could ramp up public services by spending the proceeds of growth rather than by increasing tax levels.
Now in turn, Mr Cameron and his Merrie Men are trying to say that Labour have effectively bankrupted the economy. They are banging on about it because that's how politicians have done things for the past 30 years at least.
It all seems a bit uninspiring really if the message is, "If you think we're bad then remember the other lot last time they had a turn!".0 -
-
it is getting quite boring and shows that most of these politicians are all basically same except for the party they represent.
The problem is that there isn't a battle of ideology any more. The main parties in most countries seem to believe in some form of corporatist capitalism.
Big companies churn out big profits and pay packets that you can then tax heavily in order to finance a very large Government sector.
The argument seems to be over who is the best set of managers. Dull, dull, dull.
If one thing is likely to come out of the big changes to the world's economy likely to result from the rise of many emerging economies it's a bit more ideology as Westerners try to hang on to their standard of living in the face of a static supply of oil and a bunch of people in Asia willing to bid up the price.0 -
you're right.The problem is that there isn't a battle of ideology any more. The main parties in most countries seem to believe in some form of corporatist capitalism.
Big companies churn out big profits and pay packets that you can then tax heavily in order to finance a very large Government sector.
The argument seems to be over who is the best set of managers. Dull, dull, dull.
If one thing is likely to come out of the big changes to the world's economy likely to result from the rise of many emerging economies it's a bit more ideology as Westerners try to hang on to their standard of living in the face of a static supply of oil and a bunch of people in Asia willing to bid up the price.
the election was very similar to a presidential campaign instead of what was good for the country and economy.0 -
you're right.
the election was very similar to a presidential campaign instead of what was good for the country and economy.
The trouble with this sort of cosy consensus is that nobody is examining the structure of how things work.
Nobody wants to reform the NHS in any serious way, it remains sacrosanct despite it being massively expensive and perhaps not very good compared to other systems (e.g. Australia's). Planning laws are crazy and a real disincentive to growth. State education is patchy. The biggest predictor of your income is your Dad's income. Welfare spending is huge. Nobody seems to be sure if the UK is a regional power or a international minnow.
None of this stuff ever gets discussed in any kind of meaningful way. Nobody is called on to defend the status quo because all five parties (if you include the Welsh and Scots Nationalists) believe in the status quo in effect.0 -
Now in turn, Mr Cameron and his Merrie Men are trying to say that Labour have effectively bankrupted the economy. They are banging on about it because that's how politicians have done things for the past 30 years at least.
It all seems a bit uninspiring really if the message is, "If you think we're bad then remember the other lot last time they had a turn!".
I have to say one of my favourite times of govt was 1997-2000 when Labour ran with the Tory spending plans, almost a coalition
Extracts from United Kingdom - 2000 Article IV Consultation
Concluding Statement of the Mission
"1. The overall performance of the U.K. economy remains impressive. Output is growing at a brisk pace, the unemployment rate is at its lowest level in a quarter century (...) These achievements reflect ... sound macroeconomic policie.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Read this - this morning, http://johannhari.com/2011/03/29/the-biggest-lie-in-british-politics
an interesting view, but not sure where I stand on all this cuts versus using debt to get us out of the crisis, I'm not sure if the author is anti-conlib or pro labour but I don't think the parties are the same apart from blaming each other that is and seemingly going against what they say in thier manifestos, I think we're the product of being on a pendulum as we suffer the fate of each parties ideals to dealing with the status-quo.
As for the bigger coporations paying more tax, I think if there wasn't a multitude of taxation with several levels of loopholes, everything would be fair. As for the northern oil fiasco, everything seems to be heading toward a bait and switch state.
There, I've fulfilled my daily quota for talking rubish about random nothingness.0 -
Hope it all works out
Shell have also removed a large number of staff abroad in recent years and there is even talk of selling the petrol stations, sad days.
The aviation side of things is all that will keep the Shell brand,although all jet fuel will be supplied by Essar.
I think part of the deal includes retail outlets.
I've probably got a 5 year window,time to move on.Official MR B fan club,dont go............................0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards