We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

CPI hits 4.4pct

13468916

Comments

  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Why should the indebted not be squeezed, I believe it is known as moral hazard.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    Well I for one am glad the BOE continue to monitor it.

    Yes, it's reassuring to know that the BoE are monitoring inflation. As long as they continue to do so, I'll be happy to continue paying higher food/fuel/clothing prices.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    ILW wrote: »
    Why should the indebted not be squeezed, I believe it is known as moral hazard.

    Correct.

    The younger generation will be watching what's going on. In some cases hey will have seen their parents take on large amounts of debt. They will have witnessed the credit crunch, and even if they don't fully understand it, they will know that no matter how much debt they take on, no matter what mess the financial markets get into, they won't end up in financial trouble. And in the unlikely event that they do struggle with their debts.........

    http://www.effectivedebtsolutions.co.uk/debt-written-off

    Marvelous !
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • Kohoutek
    Kohoutek Posts: 2,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    Why should the indebted not be squeezed, I believe it is known as moral hazard.

    Our economy depends to a great extent on consumers and home owners being able to take on and service debt.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Kohoutek wrote: »
    Our economy depends to a great extent on consumers and home owners being able to take on and service debt.

    So "prudence" is a bad thing?
  • wolvoman
    wolvoman Posts: 1,181 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    Why should the indebted not be squeezed, I believe it is known as moral hazard.

    But do you beleive savers should be shielded from such moral hazard?
  • Kohoutek
    Kohoutek Posts: 2,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    So "prudence" is a bad thing?

    Nope. But the prudent shouldn't expect the indebted to pay more interest to them than they can afford to...

    Do you seriously think that the indebted being squeezed would be beneficial to the UK economy as a whole, given the fragile state it's in?
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Kohoutek wrote: »
    Nope. But the prudent shouldn't expect the indebted to pay more interest to them than they can afford to...

    Do you seriously think that the indebted being squeezed would be beneficial to the UK economy as a whole, given the fragile state it's in?

    It may help prevent it all happening again.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    Kohoutek wrote: »
    Do you seriously think that the indebted being squeezed would be beneficial to the UK economy as a whole, given the fragile state it's in?

    Do you think that the economy would be in such a fragile state if there were less indebted people, or those with debt had smaller debts ?
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    wolvoman wrote: »
    But do you beleive savers should be shielded from such moral hazard?

    Yes........
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.