We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Gender rule

According to the Daily Mail men will be required to pay between 5% and 10% extra for their annuities owing to the European Court ruling. The Daily Mail suggests that 5% is realistic.

This means that men have to subsidise women who are not their wives, i.e. 5% of your working life has gone to fund women.

If your man pension pot was £100,000, it is now only £95,000.

This is another aspect of courts and governments pecking away at pensions. If looks like a MAN TAX.

This makes drawdown far more attractive for me. It's like receiving a 5% bonus on your pension fund before you even start.
I have osteoarthritis in my hands so I speak my messages into a microphone using Dragon. Some people make "typos" but I often make "speakos".

Comments

  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Isn't the obvious advice not to get an annuity?
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Anyone who's a true (and married) gentleman and therefore had planned on an annuity with a 100% widow's pension would presumably be effected much less?
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • Sterlingtimes
    Sterlingtimes Posts: 2,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kidmugsy wrote: »
    Anyone who's a true (and married) gentleman and therefore had planned on an annuity with a 100% widow's pension would presumably be effected much less?

    That may be the case, but a husband and wife together may decide that for that portion of their pension investment they would prefer more money today than money tomorrow. It is not necessarily a matter of the ungentlemanly husband contriving to leave his wife short.

    Annuities seem to be becoming far less attractive for men.
    I have osteoarthritis in my hands so I speak my messages into a microphone using Dragon. Some people make "typos" but I often make "speakos".
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sorry if I seemed too light-hearted. I'm doing drawdown but am considering recommending to my wife that she buy an annuity in a year or two. That's presumably the sort of thing you meant?
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • JOHNGT
    JOHNGT Posts: 108 Forumite
    Difference will be nowhere near 5%. Compare the male rates and female rates today, they are only about 5% apart. Bear in mind that 80% of money buying annuities is male money and you might expect male rates to fall by no more than 2% or 3%.

    Returns on the underlying annuity investments (long-dated bonds) can have a far bigger impact.

    Beware of commentators quoted in The Mail who suggest men should buy now, before things get worse. They might be working for 'IFAs' that have their own annuity shop. In truth, they are not IFAs at all and their annuity service doesn't give real advice.

    Go see a real IFA if in doubt.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.