We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Those hit by employee mortage 'Benefit in Kind' stand up and be counted!
Options
Comments
-
I think I may seek legal advice for being missold the product in the first place without being made fully aware of the floating rate tax implications
Did you seek financial advice when purchasing the product or did you buy without advice?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I think I may seek legal advice for being missold the product in the first place without being made fully aware of the floating rate tax implications
Was the mortgage taken with any regulated advice, or were you just given the option of a staff mortgage or an ordinary one.
They would probably also need to be able to give tax advice as well most mortgage advisors probably can't do that.
The generral principle with tax is it is your resonsibilty to get it right.0 -
Looking at your mortgage
£200k base -0.11% alternative base + 0.24%
April 2008 the base rate was 5% till Oct 2008
official rate was 6.25%
Edit 1 : posted too soon
So if I have this right, not 100% sure how this BIK is calculatted but can check
you took a 0.35% discount for a BIK of 1.25%
Even taxed at 20% or 40% you were making a loss when you took out the loan from the begining.
edit 3 : looks like you were 0.1% better off at 20% tax. ( so £200 )
Is this right?
edit 2 : add the links to the data
BIK
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/interest-beneficial.htm
base
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/mfsd/iadb/Repo.asp0 -
opinions4u wrote: »HBOS always sold staff loans on a non-advised basis.
Their argument was that it was down to the individual staff member to better understand their personal tax situation.
I personally think that's a reasonable approach.
That matches what it was like at Lloyds when I was there. Staff mortgages were non-advised. They gave some generic info but if you wanted advice then you needed to seek it accordingly.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
flanajb,
If you did not have a staff mortgage, and took out a mortgage with some other lender, would you actually be better off?
FYI, it's no point complaining to the HMRC about the BIK tax, unless you believe their calculation of the tax owed is incorrect."You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0 -
had a look at the work sheet
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/ebu/p11d-ws4-2010.pdf
So for the latter part of your loan.
£200k @ 4.75 =£ 9500
interest paid
£200k @ 0.39% = £780
BIK £8720 tax at 20% is £1744.
where do you get £18k from?
Depending on salary I think some NI may also be due.
Are you a base rate taxpayer or 40%?0 -
I think your only comeback would be if you sought advice and the advisor told you that your best option was to take a staff mortgage; but then he probably would have told you that he couldn't help you with it and to do it yourself:(I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
-
getmore4less wrote: »had a look at the work sheet
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/ebu/p11d-ws4-2010.pdf
So for the latter part of your loan.
£200k @ 4.75 =£ 9500
interest paid
£200k @ 0.39% = £780
BIK £8720 tax at 20% is £1744.
where do you get £18k from?
Depending on salary I think some NI may also be due.
Are you a base rate taxpayer or 40%?
I think the OP was referring to their benefit in kind over 2 tax years:
£8720 X 2 = £17440, which is not far off £18K."You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0 -
Indeed, but that's the taxable amount, not the tax payable.I am an Independent Financial AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as an Independent Financial Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
-
maninthestreet wrote: »I think the OP was referring to their benefit in kind over 2 tax years:
£8720 X 2 = £17440, which is not far off £18K.
Should be no where near that
quick calculation on the efective BIK rate April 08-March 10 on the full £200k
1.36% 6m
1.86% 1m
3.36% 1m
4.36% 1m
4.86% 1m
5.36% 1m
4.46% 13m
which works out at around £143230
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards