We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rightmove Feb - Asking prices surge 3.1% as sellers demand higher prices
Comments
-
‘Mr Average’ will be left out in the cold in the buying and selling game.”
Shipside added: “The mass market is unlikely to recover to former volumes without the return of healthier access to credit, so continuing falls in the percentage of owner-occupiers and a consequent growth of the rented sector is the realistic prospect.”
http://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Housing-market-on-brink-of-double-dip-warning#comments“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »They're certainly bearish about the prospects for young people buying houses, noting that BTL lending is expanding as the banks view it more favorably than FTB lending, and absent an increase in FTB lending, the young of today are doomed to a generation of renting as professional landlords hoover up the limited stock available.
As for prices, they note the first 6 weeks of 2011 is virtually a mirror of the first 6 weeks of 2010, and they expect little change in the market this year, so not really that bearish, although not bullish either.
They also note the stock per agent has decreased for 6 months in a row, whilst buyer interest is very high, and that the big limiting factor for the majority of people, whether FTB's or movers, is still the ongoing mortgage rationing..... Which we all knew anyway.
Reading the report from Rightmove, there seem to be 2 arguments going on. Firstly an admission that current asking prices have no basis in market reality. Secondly that that is the way it is going to stay for a while.
For me, although Rightmove are accurately commenting on what they see now, they are not taking into consideration that the market cannot exist in this state indefinitely. Since buyers will not have access to funds at bubble levels for many years, it will have to be sellers that move on price.
Rightmove are perhaps right not to speculate on this, but they must know it's going to happen even if they won't comment on it in advance.
It's worth noting that vendors who refuse to sell do not set market prices. The vendors who actually sell (having taken a hit) are the ones who set prices.0 -
I don't suppose a wait and see attitude is appropriate?
FTB personally in favour of house price falls with own predictions for house prices over 2011.
Do enjoy these articles for fact gathering and what have you - but none of you can really tell me you are certain of a movement one way or the other? Seems like a giant waste of energy to me given the underlying asset in question and macro-economic factors driving them.
Especially all the 'Final Score' and 'Beatings' talk. Almost sounds as you are speaking in absolutes and the year isn't even over!
Time will tell, sooner or later, time will tell...Hope For The Best, Plan For The Worst0 -
I don't suppose a wait and see attitude is appropriate?
FTB personally in favour of house price falls with own predictions for house prices over 2011.
Do enjoy these articles for fact gathering and what have you - but none of you can really tell me you are certain of a movement one way or the other? Seems like a giant waste of energy to me given the underlying asset in question and macro-economic factors driving them.
Especially all the 'Final Score' and 'Beatings' talk. Almost sounds as you are speaking in absolutes and the year isn't even over!
Time will tell, sooner or later, time will tell...
Indeed. Time will tell. But the fact that the excessive loans have dried up means that sooner or later prices will fall.0 -
Indeed. Time will tell. But the fact that the excessive loans have dried up means that sooner or later prices will fall.
Not at all.
As we've seen, when prices fall, supply falls also.
And as the Rightmove report confirms, supply has now fallen for 6 months in a row.
The most likely result is that we continue bumping along the bottom at a reduced volume of sales and current prices until lending improves.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »
‘Mr Average’ will be left out in the cold in the buying and selling game.”
Shipside added: “The mass market is unlikely to recover to former volumes without the return of healthier access to credit, so continuing falls in the percentage of owner-occupiers and a consequent growth of the rented sector is the realistic prospect.”
http://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Housing-market-on-brink-of-double-dip-warning#comments
Better get used to it. Banks aren't going to lend silly money. The days of liar loans, self cert and 100% mortgages are long gone0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Not at all.
As we've seen, when prices fall, supply falls also.
And as the Rightmove report confirms, supply has now fallen for 6 months in a row.
The most likely result is that we continue bumping along the bottom at a reduced volume of sales and current prices until lending improves.
...or until there is a mass of forced sales. The market can't remain as it is forever. One way or the other, market conditions will change.
If nothing else, eventually everyone that currently owns a house will be dead and so the house will go as a probate sale. Clearly that is a process that would take quite a long time and other events are likely to happen first!0 -
...or until there is a mass of forced sales. The market can't remain as it is forever. One way or the other, market conditions will change.
If nothing else, eventually everyone that currently owns a house will be dead and so the house will go as a probate sale. Clearly that is a process that would take quite a long time and other events are likely to happen first!
Or divorces, or is made redundant, or emigrates or downsizes........
At a point confidence in the housing market must fall. Then prices will drop a few steps quite rapidly. As people attempt to cash in.
I suspect there's too many who haven't any experience of the real world other than the boom economic years.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Not at all.
As we've seen, when prices fall, supply falls also.
And as the Rightmove report confirms, supply has now fallen for 6 months in a row.
The most likely result is that we continue bumping along the bottom at a reduced volume of sales and current prices until lending improves.
As has already been said, ridiculous. Is that it Hamish, is that all you hang your tenuous arguments on ?
I thought you had more. The huge amount that has been done to stop prices falling has only suceeded in paralysing the housing market.
As has been pointed out that paralysis can not continue indefinitely. What's worse is it's not in a healthy state, able to absorb policy changes etc, it's hanging by a thread and everyone can see it, even VIs, they just won't admit it.Have owned outright since Sept 2009, however I'm of the firm belief that high prices are a cancer on society, they have sucked money out of the economy, handing it to banks who've squandered it.0 -
As has already been said, ridiculous. Is that it Hamish, is that all you hang your tenuous arguments on ?...
in hamish's defence his theory is so mindless & speculative that it's almost impossible to counter it without adopting a very similar approach oneself - making it quire hard to respond.FACT.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
