We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A bit of collaboration between Inland revenue and Banks

2»

Comments

  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    I know they have checked ownership of property before.

    Perhaps if you are under investigation they can do what the heck they like.
    Hence using Experian to trace an individual. Although they do use the Land Registry, just as a Debt Collection Agency does to trace properties owned by people.
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Perhaps if you are under investigation they can do what the heck they like.

    My understanding is that is why the Inland Revenue was merged with Customs. Her Majesty's Customs is an ancient body and so can do pretty much what it wants. The IR was more constrained by niceties such as needing court orders and stuff. The idea was to give the same freedoms to the IR without having to make it obvious what was happening.

    Then The Human Rights Act came in which, in theory, stops the Government from doing what the hell it wants. Unless The Act is repealed of course.
  • Generali wrote: »
    My understanding is that is why the Inland Revenue was merged with Customs. Her Majesty's Customs is an ancient body and so can do pretty much what it wants. The IR was more constrained by niceties such as needing court orders and stuff. The idea was to give the same freedoms to the IR without having to make it obvious what was happening.

    Then The Human Rights Act came in which, in theory, stops the Government from doing what the hell it wants. Unless The Act is repealed of course.


    Apart from the fact The Human Rights Act was 5 years (I think it was 2000) before the merging of Customs & The Inland Revenue. ;)
    Not Again
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.