We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Interest rates to hit 1.25% by year end

macaque_2
Posts: 2,439 Forumite
They have no choice from what I can see. It is a case of the devil and the deep blue sea.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8326357/Interest-rates-to-rise-Mervyn-King-hints.html
Mervyn King, the Bank of England’s governor, has given his clearest signal yet that rates could hit 1.25 per cent by the year end, as he warned that inflation could cause serious problems for families over the next three years.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8326357/Interest-rates-to-rise-Mervyn-King-hints.html
0
Comments
-
If he is being wild & reckless maybe 1.5%Not Again0
-
I wish they'd hurry up and do it. Whilst inflation (4%) exceeds what I earn on my savings (3%) then I am losing money each month.:footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
If someone had said the same thing three years ago, they would have been laughed at.0
-
rates won't go up as long as the economy is on its knees. Rates were slashed because of the crash, and with the economy at best stagflating away it would be madness to raise rates and stifle demand yet further.
As and when we actually see some sustainable growth, THEN raise rates. However, some onus will have to be put on banks to stop the current profiteering. If they simply pass on rate rised direct to borrowers there will be a lot of bankrupts out there. Halifax charged me less than 1% on top of base rate for a mortgage in 2006. The same offer today would be 6% on top.0 -
If the likes of Hamish are to be believed, apparently this kind of rise will have no effect on the housing market...........
I beg to differ, as I wonder how much of that .75% rise (if it happens) will be added to many SVR mortgages ? I'd say all of it, and lets be clear many people vulnerable to defaulting will be the very people on these SVR's as many are unable to get new deals due to NE and lending restrictions.
There is absolutely no question that rises in rates, no matter how small will increase forced sellers, and it will be directly proportional to the size of any rate hike.Have owned outright since Sept 2009, however I'm of the firm belief that high prices are a cancer on society, they have sucked money out of the economy, handing it to banks who've squandered it.0 -
Rochdale_Pioneers wrote: »However, some onus will have to be put on banks to stop the current profiteering.
Profit = Tax
Do you think the Condems will be in any hurry to sort that one out?Not Again0 -
More than happy to see 1.25% by year end. But only if that means I can get 3.65% on instant savings instead of the measly 2.9%. Might almost cover inflation then! For two years, net savers have paid a big 'price'. Time for net borrowers to share the pain methinks.0
-
Rochdale_Pioneers wrote: »rates won't go up as long as the economy is on its knees. Rates were slashed because of the crash, and with the economy at best stagflating away it would be madness to raise rates and stifle demand yet further.
As and when we actually see some sustainable growth, THEN raise rates. However, some onus will have to be put on banks to stop the current profiteering. If they simply pass on rate rised direct to borrowers there will be a lot of bankrupts out there. Halifax charged me less than 1% on top of base rate for a mortgage in 2006. The same offer today would be 6% on top.
Wishful thinking. No doubt the bank would like to keep rates low much longer, but their hand is being forced by the high inflation - which left uncontrolled will also damage the economy.
The Bank has already dropped some big hints that rates will rise so I'm surprised you are still confident they will not.0 -
Loughton_Monkey wrote: »Time for net borrowers to share the pain methinks.
:rotfl:
You mean SVR mortgage borrowers.
All other debt is expensiveNot Again0 -
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »:rotfl:
You mean SVR mortgage borrowers.
All other debt is expensive
I basically mean all borrowers except myself!
Personally, I'm on a BR+1% Offset. Could probably still 'make a decent turn' at total 2.25% provided I could get 3.65% on savings. Otherwise, I'd be forced to offset it fully again!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards