We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: EU ruling could cut male retirement income
Former_MSE_Guy
Posts: 1,650 Forumite
"Experts warn that from March males could lose the favourable rates they currently get when buying an annuity ..."
0
Comments
-
I thought this craziness had been knocked on the head, at least as far as motor insurance premiums were concerned?I think....0
-
i guess if the assumptions made in the artical are correct and mens annuity go down but car insurance goes down aswell this should be about even for men over a life time, shame it will cost women more as their car insurance will go up but their annuity will stay the sameDrop a brand challenge
on a £100 shop you might on average get 70 items save
10p per product = £7 a week ~ £28 a month
20p per product = £14 a week ~ £56 a month
30p per product = £21 a week ~ £84 a month (or in other words one weeks shoping at the new price)0 -
Motor Insurance and annuities are - and should remain - based on the generic risk. If the EU says that a 17 yo male driver in a Ferrari should pay the same insurance cost as a 40 yo female in a Ford Fiesta would we comply? Of course not, and I would imagine that most EU countries will look at this potential "equality" ruling and totally ignore it. Sadly I assume that on this issue we in the UK will bow deferentially to these mandarins of Brussels who clearly have less intelligence than the average teapot.0
-
Motor Insurance and annuities are calculated - and should remain - based on the generic risk. If the EU says that a 17 yo male driver in a Ferrari should pay the same insurance cost as a 40 yo female in a Ford Fiesta would we comply? Of course not, and I would imagine that most EU countries will look at this potential "equality" ruling and totally ignore it. Sadly I assume that on this issue we will bow deferentially to these mandarins of Brussels who clearly have less intelligence than the average teapot.0
-
Motor Insurance and annuities are calculated - and should remain - based on the generic risk. If the EU says that a 17 yo male driver in a Ferrari should pay the same insurance cost as a 40 yo female in a Ford Fiesta would we comply? Of course not, and I would imagine that most EU countries will look at this potential "equality" ruling and totally ignore it. Sadly I assume that on this issue we will bow deferentially to these mandarins of Brussels who clearly have less intelligence than the average teapot.
Some of Europe already complies. The UK, amongst others, applied for an opt-out. The opt-out lets countries apply gender-differentiated rates which can be justified by statistical/actuarial data. However, now the legality of the opt-out is being questioned.0 -
Another reason I'll be doing a 'drawdown'0
-
Aberdeenangarse wrote: »Another reason I'll be doing a 'drawdown'
With a lower "GAD" amount, obviously!
It's about time Cameron took Her Majesty on a trip to Brussels, perhaps accompanied by Nigel Farage who has, I believe, a 'way with words' when it comes to European matters.
They should be left under no illusions as to who is running this country.0 -
Any ruling would also affect motor insurance premiums. Men tend to pay more because they are involved in more accidents than women but this could also change, with male premiums set to fall, while women's costs could rise.
er... correct?
Certainly in my day - admittedly quite a few years ago, it was a 'fact' that women have more accidents than men 'per mile'. The reason for cheaper female rates (and as far as I can recall, I was the first to introduce female discounts on Motor Insurance in UK) is simply that on average, they do significantly fewer miles, giving them an overall reduction in claims cost per annum.
I cannot confirm this is still the case.0 -
Is this correct? Are you really suggesting that the average life span of someone born later is now reducing?...A healthy 55-year-old man is expected to live for another 25.7 while a woman of the same age is forecast to live another 28.8 years – 12% longer.
A healthy 75-year-old man is expected to live for another 10.7 years compared to 12.5 years for a woman – 17% longer...
Current 55 year old average life span
male: 55 + 25.7 = 80.7 years
female: 55 + 28.8 years = 83.8 years
Current 75 year old average life span
male: 75 + 10.7 = 85.7 years
female: 75 + 12.5 years = 87.5 years
That's not what the ONS were saying in a report last year :huh:"Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 20100
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

