We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Have BoE Lost All Credibility Over IRs?

1235710

Comments

  • AD9898_2
    AD9898_2 Posts: 527 Forumite
    ILW-- A plane might fall on my house.

    Hamish--- What makes you think that is remotely likely?

    ILW--- It's a big sky with a lot of planes.

    Hamish--- Again, can you explain why you think there is more than a 0.00000000001% chance of a plane falling on your house?

    ILW--- Well a plane once fell on someones house...... There's a lot of planes....

    Hamish--- Never mind.

    I definitely wouldn't put rates rising to 3% or above in the same category as a plane falling on my house. Just as a side question Hamish, if you were say 25, just starting out in life, what would you like to see happen to house prices from their current level.
    Have owned outright since Sept 2009, however I'm of the firm belief that high prices are a cancer on society, they have sucked money out of the economy, handing it to banks who've squandered it.
  • Generali wrote: »
    He's wrong. If anyone would give me a thousand to one even I'd bite their hand off (odd expression on reflection).

    Well, I don't think a million to one is accurate, nor even a thousand to one, but I do think the chances of it happening are vanishingly small.

    If I had to put odds on it, somewhere around 100-1.

    The BoE have already stated they believe the neutrality level for base rates is now somewhere around 3%. Other commentators suggest it's actually lower, at 2.5%.

    I'm just not seeing where the expansion of money supply will come from in the next decade to require demand destruction of the magnitude that would happen with base rates at nearly double the neutrality point.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • ILW wrote: »
    Apparently you know that rates will still be under 5%.

    I know that risk is quantified by the probability of an occurence times the impact of an ocurrence.

    So assuming rates will remain below 5% for a decade is very far from risky.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Percy1983
    Percy1983 Posts: 5,244 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The current rates do worry me slightly, as the projected buying date for us is just over a year it might be clearer then, but right now I would liek to bet either way and I get a feeling whichever path we choose will be the wrong one.
    Have my first business premises (+4th business) 01/11/2017
    Quit day job to run 3 businesses 08/02/2017
    Started third business 25/06/2016
    Son born 13/09/2015
    Started a second business 03/08/2013
    Officially the owner of my own business since 13/01/2012
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Percy1983 wrote: »
    The current rates do worry me slightly, as the projected buying date for us is just over a year it might be clearer then, but right now I would liek to bet either way and I get a feeling whichever path we choose will be the wrong one.

    You can bet that interest rates will head higher as they can't really go much lower. When and by how much? Nobody knows.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    I know that risk is quantified by the probability of an occurence times the impact of an ocurrence.

    So assuming rates will remain below 5% for a decade is very far from risky.

    All depends on what the impact will be.

    My earlier point was that if someone is RELYING upon IRs staying below 5% in then years that is a pretty big gamble.
  • AD9898 wrote: »
    Hamish, if you were say 25, just starting out in life, what would you like to see happen to house prices from their current level.

    If I was 25 and starting out in life I'd know full well that the sticker price of the house was the least important component of total cost.

    I'd want interest rates to stay as low as possible for as long as possible, as this will have a far bigger impact on the total cost I pay than the sticker price of the house itself.

    Given the choice, the young should be praying for peak prices and base rates of 2%, rather than 20% falls and base rates of 5%....
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If we are talking a bout 10 years isn’t some of that gamble off set by wage inflation?
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 7 February 2011 at 1:25PM
    ILW wrote: »
    My earlier point was that if someone is RELYING upon IRs staying below 5% in then years that is a pretty big gamble.

    Why?

    Once again I ask you to explain the conditions under which you think a rise to 5% in a decade is a probable scenario, and why the impact of a rate rise over that timeframe would be devastating. In other words, why is it "very risky" as you claim.

    If you can't, then there is no point continuing this discussion.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • ukcarper wrote: »
    If we are talking a bout 10 years isn’t some of that gamble off set by wage inflation?

    Now we're getting somewhere.....;)
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.