Does the "Limitation Act" stand with the CSA

richard12345

Orson_Cart wrote: »

This is not an Act of Parliament or primary legislation, its secondary legislation, but it seeks to rebuke an established Act of Parliament namely Section 2 of the Limitation Act 1980 which in any event pre-dates it.

But when has anything as petty as the law of the land bothered them, Blob's 2 year steer is a case in point. It is not a law, it's what M.P's told them to use as a target for recovering outstanding payments. Because it was a target, they immediately came to existing NRP's and reneged on all previous agreements, or agreements set by the courts and told us it was a law that all money had to be paid within 2 years.
This was purely to say they had hit certain targets, and obviously it's much easier to squeeze the life out of people that are already paying than to actually spend time and effort chasing the genuine deadbeats.
At the same time, make sure the media get plenty of stories of absent fathers, and the EVIL members of fathers for justice, so as to take the sympathy vote away from the NRP's busy killing themselves because they can see no way out.

1984 is here everybody, open your eyes.

Blob

Have meeting to get a meeting with Minister, the first is in early March the second will be in April soonest!

This point will be included as well as others, such as possibly the CSA being put on the block for 'Treason'. If this happens then there is on defense available to them in the way of we just did as we were told!!!

Rorkes_Drift

Let us know the reply.

PreludeForTimeFeelers

Blob wrote: »

Have meeting to get a meeting with Minister, the first is in early March the second will be in April soonest!

This point will be included as well as others, such as possibly the CSA being put on the block for 'Treason'. If this happens then there is on defense available to them in the way of we just did as we were told!!!

In what way have they committed 'treason'?

Blob

It is very simple, they are going after serving troops on the front line in Afghan. This is as a result affecting the moral of our troops on active service. This is in simple tearms is 'Giving aid to an enemy of the Crown'. This is a fact as such it will stand and however you want to wrap it up that is Treason, end of.

As a side point, under the law of this land, you can still be hanged for Treason, don't for one second think it will happen, but it is a nice thought!

Orson_Cart_2

Although a treasonable offence still exists, the CPS dont prosecute it. For example Princess Diana admitted having sex with James Hewitt while she was married to Prince Charles. Its also evident just looking at Prince Harrys resemblence to him.